Opioid-related Mortality in United States Death Certificate Data: A Quantitative Bias Analysis With Expert Elicitation of Bias Parameters

Author:

Goldsmith Elizabeth S.12ORCID,Krebs Erin E.12ORCID,Ramirez Marizen R.3ORCID,MacLehose Richard F.4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research (CCDOR), Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System

2. Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School

3. Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota

4. Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota

Abstract

Background: Opioid-related mortality is an important public health problem in the United States. Incidence estimates rely on death certificate data generated by health care providers and medical examiners. Opioid overdoses may be underreported when other causes of death appear plausible. We applied physician-elicited death certificate bias parameters to quantitative bias analyses assessing potential age-related differential misclassification in US opioid-related mortality estimates. Methods: We obtained cause-of-death data (US, 2017) from the National Center for Health Statistics and calculated crude opioid-related outpatient death counts by age category (25–54, 55–64, 65+). We elicited beliefs from 10 primary care physicians on sensitivity of opioid-related death classification from death certificates. We summarized elicited sensitivity estimates, calculated plausible specificity values, and applied resulting parameters in a probabilistic bias analysis. Results: Physicians estimated wide sensitivity ranges for classification of opioid-related mortality by death certificates, with lower estimated sensitivities among older age groups. Probabilistic bias analyses adjusting for physician-estimated misclassification indicated 3.1 times more (95% uncertainty interval: 1.2–23.5) opioid-related deaths than the observed death count in the 65+ age group. All age groups had substantial increases in bias-adjusted death counts. Conclusions: We developed and implemented a feasible method of eliciting physician expert opinion on bias parameters for sensitivity of a medical record-based death indicator and applied findings in quantitative bias analyses adjusting for differential misclassification. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that opioid-related mortality rates may be substantially underestimated, particularly among older adults, due to misclassification in cause-of-death data from death certificates.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Epidemiology

Reference28 articles.

1. National trends in long-term use of prescription opioids.;Mojtabai;Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf,2018

2. Trends in abuse and misuse of prescription opioids among older adults.;West;Drug Alcohol Depend,2015

3. Generational shift and drug abuse in older Americans.;White;J Soc Behav Heal Sci,2011

4. Principles and pitfalls: a guide to death certification.;Brooks;Clin Med Res,2015

5. Serious illness and limitations of death certificate-based data: urgent lessons from the opioid epidemic.;Merlin;Am J Public Health,2022

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3