Massachusetts Prevalence of Opioid Use Disorder Estimation Revisited: Comparing a Bayesian Approach to Standard Capture–Recapture Methods

Author:

Wang Jianing1,Doogan Nathan2,Thompson Katherine3,Bernson Dana4,Feaster Daniel5,Villani Jennifer6,Chandler Redonna6,White Laura F.1,Kline David7,Barocas Joshua A.8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA

2. Ohio Colleges of Medicine Government Resource Center, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, OH

3. Department of Statistics, School of Arts and Sciences, University of Kentucky, KY

4. Office of Population Health, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA

5. Department of Public Health Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL

6. National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

7. Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC

8. Department of Medicine, Divisions of General Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado School of medicine, Aurora, CO.

Abstract

Background: The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) estimated the prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) among the civilian, noninstitutionalized people aged 12 years or older in Massachusetts as 1.2% between 2015 and 2017. Accurate estimation of the prevalence of OUD is critical to the success of treatment and resource planning. Various indirect estimation approaches have been used but are subject to data availability and infrastructure-related issues. Methods: We used 2015 data from the Massachusetts Public Health Data Warehouse (PHD) to compare the results of two approaches to estimating OUD prevalence in the Massachusetts population. First, we used a seven-dataset capture–recapture analysis under log–linear model parameterization, controlling for the source dependence and effects of age, sex, and county through stratification. Second, we applied a benchmark-multiplier method in a Bayesian framework by linking health care claims data to death certificate data assuming an extrapolation of death rates from observed untreated OUD to unobserved OUD. Results: Our estimates for OUD prevalence among Massachusetts residents (aged 18–64 years) were 4.62% (95% CI = 4.59%, 4.64%) in the capture–recapture approach and 4.29% (95% CrI = 3.49%, 5.32%) in the Bayesian model. Both estimates were approximately four times higher than NSDUH estimates. Conclusion: The synthesis of our findings suggests that the disease surveillance system misses a large portion of the population with OUD. Our study also suggests that concurrent use of multiple methods improves the justification and facilitates the triangulation and interpretation of the resulting estimates. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04111939.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Epidemiology

Reference19 articles.

1. “Reframing the opioid epidemic as a national emergency,”.;Gostin;JAMA,2017

2. “Data needs and models for the opioid epidemic,”.;Blanco;Mol Psychiatry,2022

3. “Probability and predictors of treatment-seeking for prescription opioid use disorders: a national study,”.;Blanco;Drug Alcohol Depend,2013

4. Models for medication assisted treatment for opioid use disorder, retention, and continuity of care. Report by Office of Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. 2020.;O’Brien

5. “Social stigma toward persons with opioid use disorder: results from a nationally representative survey of U.S. adults,”.;Taylor;Subst Use Misuse,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3