Self-reported Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and Vaccine Effectiveness Among Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Quantitative Bias Analysis

Author:

Chambers Catharine12ORCID,Deeks Shelley L.34,Sutradhar Rinku15,Cox Joseph67,de Pokomandy Alexandra6,Grennan Troy89,Hart Trevor A.110,Lambert Gilles7,Moore David M.11,Grace Daniel1,Grewal Ramandip2,Jollimore Jody12,Lachowsky Nathan J.13,Mah Ashley2,Nisenbaum Rosane12,Ogilvie Gina89,Sauvageau Chantal14,Tan Darrell H.S.2,Yeung Anna2,Burchell Ann N.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

2. Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. Government of Nova Scotia, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

4. Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

5. ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

6. McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada

7. Direction régionale de santé publique de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada

8. British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

9. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

10. Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

11. British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver British Columbia, Canada

12. Community-Based Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

13. University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

14. Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Québec, Québec, Canada.

Abstract

Background: Self-report of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has ~80–90% sensitivity and ~75–85% specificity. We measured the effect of nondifferential exposure misclassification associated with self-reported vaccination on vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates. Methods: Between 2017–2019, we recruited sexually active gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men aged 16–30 years in Canada. VE was derived as 1−prevalence ratio × 100% for prevalent anal HPV infection comparing vaccinated (≥1 dose) to unvaccinated men using a multivariable modified Poisson regression. We conducted a multidimensional and probabilistic quantitative bias analysis to correct VE estimates. Results: Bias-corrected VE estimates were relatively stable across sensitivity values but differed from the uncorrected estimate at lower values of specificity. The median adjusted VE was 27% (2.5–97.5th simulation interval = −5–49%) in the uncorrected analysis, increasing to 39% (2.5–97.5th simulation interval = 2–65%) in the bias-corrected analysis. Conclusion: A large proportion of participants erroneously reporting HPV vaccination would be required to meaningfully change VE estimates.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Epidemiology

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3