Comparative Analysis of Instrumental Variables on the Assignment of Buprenorphine/Naloxone or Methadone for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder

Author:

Homayra Fahmida1,Enns Benjamin1,Min Jeong Eun1,Kurz Megan1,Bach Paxton23,Bruneau Julie4,Greenland Sander5,Gustafson Paul6,Karim Mohammad Ehsanul17,Korthuis P. Todd8,Loughin Thomas9,MacLure Malcolm10,McCandless Lawrence11,Platt Robert William12,Schnepel Kevin13,Shigeoka Hitoshi13,Siebert Uwe141516,Socias Eugenia3,Wood Evan23,Nosyk Bohdan111

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

2. British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

3. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

4. Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

5. Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA

6. Department of Statistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

7. School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

8. Addiction Medicine Section, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR

9. Department of Statistics and Actuarial Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

10. Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

11. Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

12. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

13. Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

14. Department of Public Health, Health Services Research, and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT-University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics, and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria

15. Department of Health Policy and Management, Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA

16. Department of Radiology, Program on Cardiovascular Research, Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Abstract

Background: Instrumental variable (IV) analysis provides an alternative set of identification assumptions in the presence of uncontrolled confounding when attempting to estimate causal effects. Our objective was to evaluate the suitability of measures of prescriber preference and calendar time as potential IVs to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of buprenorphine/naloxone versus methadone for treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). Methods: Using linked population-level health administrative data, we constructed five IVs: prescribing preference at the individual, facility, and region levels (continuous and categorical variables), calendar time, and a binary prescriber’s preference IV in analyzing the treatment assignment–treatment discontinuation association using both incident-user and prevalent-new-user designs. Using published guidelines, we assessed and compared each IV according to the four assumptions for IVs, employing both empirical assessment and content expertise. We evaluated the robustness of results using sensitivity analyses. Results: The study sample included 35,904 incident users (43.3% on buprenorphine/naloxone) initiated on opioid agonist treatment by 1585 prescribers during the study period. While all candidate IVs were strong (A1) according to conventional criteria, by expert opinion, we found no evidence against assumptions of exclusion (A2), independence (A3), monotonicity (A4a), and homogeneity (A4b) for prescribing preference-based IV. Some criteria were violated for the calendar time-based IV. We determined that preference in provider-level prescribing, measured on a continuous scale, was the most suitable IV for comparative effectiveness of buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone for the treatment of OUD. Conclusions: Our results suggest that prescriber’s preference measures are suitable IVs in comparative effectiveness studies of treatment for OUD.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Epidemiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3