Diagnostic Accuracy of Procalcitonin in Bacterial Infections of the CNS: An Updated Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression*

Author:

Biasucci Daniele Guerino1,Sergi Paola Giuseppina2,Bilotta Federico3,Dauri Mario12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, “Tor Vergata” University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

2. Emergency Department, “Tor Vergata” University Hospital, Rome, Italy.

3. Department of General and Specialistic Surgery, “La Sapienza” University, Rome, Italy.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) procalcitonin for diagnosing CNS bacterial infections. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and International Web of Science databases from January 1, 2016, to September 30, 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials and observational studies, either prospective or retrospective, focusing on procalcitonin as a biomarker for CNS infections. DATA EXTRACTION: We screened and extracted studies independently and in duplicate. We assessed risk of bias using the revised Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy tool. Data for diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were pooled using the bivariate or hierarchical model, as appropriate. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 5,347 citations identified, 23 studies were included. Overall, CSF procalcitonin showed slightly higher pooled sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratio compared with serum procalcitonin. In adults, pooled sensitivity of CSF procalcitonin was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.71–0.96), specificity 0.81 (95% CI, 0.66–0.91); pooled sensitivity of serum procalcitonin was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.58–0.94), specificity 0.77 (95% CI, 0.60–0.89). In children, pooled sensitivity of CSF procalcitonin was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.88–0.99), specificity 0.91 (95% CI, 0.72–0.97); pooled sensitivity of serum procalcitonin was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.75–0.97), specificity 0.83 (95% CI, 0.67–0.92). In post-neurosurgical patients, pooled sensitivity of CSF procalcitonin was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.53–0.95), specificity 0.81 (95% CI, 0.63–0.91); pooled sensitivity of serum procalcitonin was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.33–0.88), specificity 0.61 (95% CI, 0.41–0.78). Logistic regression revealed between-study heterogeneity higher for serum than CSF procalcitonin. For the latter, threshold variability was found as source of heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: In children and critical post-neurosurgical patients, CSF procalcitonin gains superior sensitivity and specificity compared with serum procalcitonin. Overall, CSF procalcitonin appears to have a higher pooled positive likelihood ratio compared with serum procalcitonin.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3