Effect of a Standardized Family Participation Program in the ICU: A Multicenter Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Dijkstra Boukje M.12,Rood Paul J.T.12,Teerenstra Steven3,Rutten Anne M.F.4,Leerentveld Crista5,Burgers-Bonthuis Dominique C.6,Festen-Spanjer Barbara7,Klarenbeek Toine8,Van Den Boogaard Mark2,Ewalds Esther9,Schoonhoven Lisette1011,Van Der Hoeven Johannes G.2,Vloet Lilian C.M.11213,

Affiliation:

1. Research Department Emergency and Critical Care, School of Health Studies Nijmegen, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

2. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

3. Department for Health Evidence, Section Biostatistics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

4. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

5. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, ISALA Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.

6. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Rijnstate, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

7. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands.

8. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.

9. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Bernhoven, Uden, The Netherlands.

10. Nursing Science, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

11. School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.

12. IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

13. Foundation for Family and Patient Centered Intensive Care, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the effect of a standardized program for family participation in essential care activities in the ICU on symptoms of anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress and satisfaction among relatives, and perceptions and experiences of ICU healthcare providers (HCPs). Design: Multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Setting: Seven adult ICUs, one university, and six general teaching hospitals. Participants: Three hundred six relatives and 235 ICU HCPs. Interventions: A standardized program to facilitate family participation inpatient communication, amusement/distraction, comfort, personal care, breathing, mobilization, and nutrition. Measurements and Main Results: Data were collected through surveys among relatives and ICU HCPs. There were no significant differences in symptoms of anxiety in relatives in the intervention period compared with the control period (median Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS] 5 [interquartile range (IQR) 2–10] vs 6 [IQR 3–9]; median ratio [MR] 0.72; 95% CI, 0.46–1.13; p = 0.15), depression (median HADS 4 [IQR 2–6] vs 3 [IQR 1–6]; MR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.55–1.32; p = 0.47) or posttraumatic stress (median Impact of Event Scale-Revised score 0.45 [IQR 0.27–0.82] vs 0.41 [IQR 0.14–1]; MR 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78–1.14; p = 0.54). Reported satisfaction was slightly lower in the intervention period (mean 8.90 [sd 1.10] vs mean 9.06 [sd 1.10], difference –0.60; 95% CI, –1.07 to –0.12; p = 0.01). ICU HCPs perceived that more relatives knew how to participate: 47% in the intervention period versus 22% in the control period (odds ratio [OR] 3.15; 95% CI, 1.64–6.05; p < 0.01). They also reported relatives having sufficient knowledge (41% vs 16%; OR 3.56; 95% CI, 1.75–7.25; p < 0.01) and skills (44% vs 25%; OR 2.38; 95% CI, 1.22–4.63; p = 0.01) to apply family participation. Conclusions: Application of a standardized program to facilitate family participation did not change mental health symptoms in relatives of ICU patients 3 months after discharge. ICU HCPs reported increased clarity, knowledge, and skills among relatives and ICU HCPs.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3