Efficacy of Carbapenems Compared With Noncarbapenem Broad-Spectrum Beta-Lactam Antibiotics as Initial Antibiotic Therapy Against Sepsis: A Nationwide Observational Study*

Author:

Umemura Yutaka12,Yamakawa Kazuma3,Tanaka Yoshihiro4,Yoshimura Jumpei2,Ogura Hiroshi2,Fujimi Satoshi1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.

2. Department of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.

4. Division of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, Shizuoka Graduate University of Public Health, Shizuoka, Japan.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: As causative pathogens are not usually identified at the time of initiating antibiotics in sepsis, carbapenems are commonly used as an initial treatment. To reduce indiscriminate use of carbapenems, the efficacy of alternative empiric regimens, such as piperacillin–tazobactam and the fourth-generation cephalosporins, should be elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate survival effect associated with carbapenems as initial therapy for sepsis compared with these antibiotics. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective observational study. SETTING: Tertiary hospitals in Japan. PATIENTS: Adult patients diagnosed as having sepsis from 2006 to 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Administration of carbapenems as initial antibiotic therapy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: This study used data of adult patients with sepsis extracted from a large-scale database in Japan. Patients were divided into two groups as follows: patients receiving carbapenems and patients receiving noncarbapenem broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics as initial treatment. In-hospital mortality was compared between the groups by a logistic regression model adjusted by an inverse probability treatment weighting using propensity scores. To evaluate heterogeneity of effects according to patient characteristics, we also fitted logistic models in several subgroups. Among 7,392 patients with sepsis, 3,547 patients received carbapenems, and 3,845 patients received noncarbapenem agents. The logistic model showed no significant association between carbapenem therapy and lower mortality (adjusted OR 0.88, p = 0.108). Subgroup analyses suggested that there were significant survival benefits associated with carbapenem therapy in patients with septic shock, in ICUs, or with mechanical ventilation (p for effect modifications: < 0.001, 0.014, and 0.105, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the noncarbapenem broad-spectrum antibiotics, carbapenems as an initial therapy for sepsis were not associated with significantly lower mortality.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3