High Mechanical Power and Driving Pressures are Associated With Postoperative Respiratory Failure Independent From Patients’ Respiratory System Mechanics*

Author:

Tartler Tim M.12,Ahrens Elena12,Munoz-Acuna Ricardo12,Azizi Basit A.12,Chen Guanqing1,Suleiman Aiman13,Wachtendorf Luca J.12,Costa Eduardo L.V.4,Talmor Daniel S.1,Amato Marcelo B.P.4,Baedorf-Kassis Elias N.25,Schaefer Maximilian S.126

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

2. Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence (CARE), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

3. Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

4. Divisão de Pneumologia, Cardiopulmonary Department, Heart Institute (INCOR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

5. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

6. Department of Anesthesiology, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: High mechanical power and driving pressure (ΔP) have been associated with postoperative respiratory failure (PRF) and may be important parameters guiding mechanical ventilation. However, it remains unclear whether high mechanical power and ΔP merely reflect patients with poor respiratory system mechanics at risk of PRF. We investigated the effect of mechanical power and ΔP on PRF in cohorts after exact matching by patients’ baseline respiratory system compliance. DESIGN: Hospital registry study. SETTING: Academic hospital in New England. PATIENTS: Adult patients undergoing general anesthesia between 2008 and 2020. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary exposure was high (≥ 6.7 J/min, cohort median) versus low mechanical power and the key-secondary exposure was high (≥ 15.0 cm H2O) versus low ΔP. The primary endpoint was PRF (reintubation or unplanned noninvasive ventilation within seven days). Among 97,555 included patients, 4,030 (4.1%) developed PRF. In adjusted analyses, high intraoperative mechanical power and ΔP were associated with higher odds of PRF (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.37 [95% CI, 1.25–1.50]; p < 0.001 and aOR 1.45 [95% CI, 1.31–1.60]; p < 0.001, respectively). There was large variability in applied ventilatory parameters, dependent on the anesthesia provider. This facilitated matching of 63,612 (mechanical power cohort) and 53,260 (ΔP cohort) patients, yielding identical baseline standardized respiratory system compliance (standardized difference [SDiff] = 0.00) with distinctly different mechanical power (9.4 [2.4] vs 4.9 [1.3] J/min; SDiff = –2.33) and ΔP (19.3 [4.1] vs 11.9 [2.1] cm H2O; SDiff = –2.27). After matching, high mechanical power and ΔP remained associated with higher risk of PRF (aOR 1.30 [95% CI, 1.17–1.45]; p < 0.001 and aOR 1.28 [95% CI, 1.12–1.46]; p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: High mechanical power and ΔP are associated with PRF independent of patient’s baseline respiratory system compliance. Our findings support utilization of these parameters for titrating mechanical ventilation in the operating room and ICU.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3