Characteristics and Outcomes of Very Elderly Patients Admitted to Intensive Care: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Analysis*

Author:

Rai Sumeet12,Brace Charlotte3,Ross Paul45,Darvall Jai67,Haines Kimberley68,Mitchell Imogen12,van Haren Frank19,Pilcher David4510

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine and Psychology, College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, Canberra, Australia.

2. Intensive Care Unit, Canberra Health Services, Garran, Canberra, Australia.

3. Department of Anaesthesia, Auckland City District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.

4. Intensive Care Unit, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

5. The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, St. Kilda Rd, Prahran, Melbourne, Australia.

6. Department of Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

7. Intensive Care Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

8. Department of Physiotherapy, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia.

9. Intensive Care Unit, St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

10. The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS), Centre for Outcome and Resources Evaluation, Camberwell, Melbourne, Australia.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To characterize and compare trends in ICU admission, hospital outcomes, and resource utilization for critically ill very elderly patients (≥ 80 yr old) compared with the younger cohort (16–79 yr old). DESIGN: A retrospective multicenter cohort study. SETTING: One-hundred ninety-four ICUs contributing data to the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation Adult Patient Database between January 2006 and December 2018. PATIENTS: Adult (≥ 16 yr) patients admitted to Australian and New Zealand ICUs. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Very elderly patients with a mean ± sd age of 84.8 ± 3.7 years accounted for 14.8% (232,582/1,568,959) of all adult ICU admissions. They had higher comorbid disease burden and illness severity scores compared with the younger cohort. Hospital (15.4% vs 7.8%, p < 0.001) and ICU mortality (8.5% vs 5.2%, p < 0.001) were higher in the very elderly. They stayed fewer days in ICU, but longer in hospital and had more ICU readmissions. Among survivors, a lower proportion of very elderly was discharged home (65.2% vs 82.4%, p < 0.001), and a higher proportion was discharged to chronic care/nursing home facilities (20.1% vs 7.8%, p < 0.001). Although there was no change in the proportion of very elderly ICU admissions over the study period, they showed a greater decline in risk-adjusted mortality (6.3% [95% CI, 5.9%–6.7%] vs 4.0% [95% CI, 3.7%–4.2%] relative reduction per year, p < 0.001) compared with the younger cohort. The mortality of very elderly unplanned ICU admissions improved faster than the younger cohort (p < 0.001), whereas improvements in mortality among elective surgical ICU admissions were similar in both groups (p = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of ICU admissions greater than or equal to 80 years old did not change over the 13-year study period. Although their mortality was higher, they showed improved survivorship over time, especially in the unplanned ICU admission subgroup. A higher proportion of survivors were discharged to chronic care facilities.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Reference41 articles.

1. Intensive care of the elderly in Finland.;Reinikainen;Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2007

2. The very elderly in intensive care: admission characteristics and mortality.;Ryan;Crit Care Resusc,2008

3. Mortality in elderly ICU patients: a cohort study.;Nielsson;Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2014

4. Longitudinal changes in ICU admissions among elderly patients in the United States.;Sjoding;Crit Care Med,2016

5. The status of intensive care medicine research and a future agenda for very old patients in the ICU.;Flaatten;Intensive Care Med,2017

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3