Nurses' Knowledge, Communication Needs, and Future Directions in Neonatal Research

Author:

Sundquist Beauman Sandra,Eklund Wakako M.ORCID,Short Mary A.,Kenner Carole

Abstract

Background: Preterm birth is a significant contributor to neonatal morbidity and mortality. Despite legislative efforts to increase pediatric drug development, neonatal clinical trials continue to be infrequent. The International Neonatal Consortium (INC) includes nurses as key stakeholders in their mission to accelerate safe and effective therapies for neonates. Purpose: INC developed a survey for nurses, physicians, and parents to explore communication practices and stakeholders' perceptions and knowledge regarding clinical trials in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Methods: A stepwise consensus approach was used to solicit responses to an online survey. The convenience sample was drawn from INC organizations representing the stakeholder groups. Representatives from the National Association of Neonatal Nurses and the Council of International Neonatal Nurses, Inc, participated in all stages of the survey development process, results analysis, and publication of results. Results: Participants included 188 nurses or nurse practitioners, mainly from the United States, Canada, the European Union, and Japan; 68% indicated some level of research involvement. Nurses expressed a lack of effective education to prepare them for participation in research. Results indicated a lack of a central information source for staff and systematic approaches to inform families of studies. The majority of nurses indicated they were not asked to provide input into clinical trials. Nurses were uncertain about research consent and result disclosure processes. Implications for Practice and Research: This study indicates the need to educate nurses in research, improve NICU research communication through standardized, systematic pathways, and leverage nurse involvement to enhance research communication.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference19 articles.

1. Updates on an at-risk population: late-preterm and early-term infants;Stewart;Pediatrics,2019

2. Regulatory science needs for neonates: a call for neonatal community collaboration and innovation;McCune;Front Pediatr,2014

3. A history of neonatal medicine—past accomplishments, lessons learned, and future challenges. Part 1—the first century;Lussky;J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther,2005

4. The International Neonatal Consortium: collaborating to advance regulatory science for neonates;Turner;Pediatr Res,2016

5. The culture of research communication in neonatal intensive care units: key stakeholder perspectives;Degl;J Perinatol,2021

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3