Mechanical testing of transtibial prosthetic sockets: A discussion paper from the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association Socket Guidance Workgroup

Author:

Gariboldi Francesca1ORCID,Cutti Andrea Giovanni2ORCID,Fatone Stefania3ORCID,Nickel Eric4ORCID,Dickinson Alex5ORCID,Steer Joshua56ORCID,Erenstone Jeffrey7ORCID,Zahedi Saeed8ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padua, Padua (PD), Italy

2. INAIL Prosthetic Center, Vigorso di Budrio (BO), Italy

3. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

4. Minneapolis VA Health Care System, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Minneapolis, MN, USA

5. Faculty of Engineering & Physical Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom

6. Radii Devices Ltd, Bristol, United Kingdom

7. Performance Orthopedic Design, LLC, Lake Placid, NY, USA

8. Blatchford, Basingstoke, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background: The advent of novel manufacturing technologies, materials, and socket design concepts could introduce risks to prosthetic limb users, as the existing knowledge base for safe fabrication may not apply. Moreover, although structural test standards exist for mass-produced prosthetic components, they are not applicable to prosthetic sockets. Methods: The “AOPA Socket Guidance Workgroup” was formed in 2020 to provide the prosthetic community with evidence-based clinical best practices and methods in the field of prosthetic socket structural analysis. This multidisciplinary expert workgroup undertook a critical analysis of the knowledge gaps regarding the requirements for mechanical testing of lower limb prosthetic sockets. Results: The Workgroup identified knowledge gaps in 4 domains. Domain 1 describes the shape and composition of a mock residual limb, required to support and generate in vivo representative loading within the socket. Domain 2 concerns prosthetic socket coordinate systems and alignment. Domain 3 regards the components and requirements of test specimens. Finally, Domain 4 considers test conditions, loading parameters, and acceptance criteria. Conclusions: This paper describes these knowledge gaps in detail and recommends potential solution approaches based on literature review, group consensus around existing knowledge, or the formation of new study groups to fill each knowledge gap. Our intent is for the recommendations arising from this paper to support the community (e.g., researchers in the clinic, academia, industry, and funders) in addressing these knowledge gaps.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Rehabilitation,Health Professions (miscellaneous)

Reference23 articles.

1. Structural testing of lower-limb prosthetic sockets: a systematic review;Gariboldi;Med Eng Phys,2022

2. CAD/CAM transtibial prosthetic sockets from central fabrication facilities: how accurate are they?;Sanders,2007

3. Static structural testing of trans-tibial composite sockets;Current;Prosthet Orthot Int,1999

4. Technical note: Principal structural testing of trans-tibial prosthetic assemblies: Specimen preparation;Neo;Prosthet Orthot Int,2000

5. Strength testing of definitive transtibial prosthetic sockets made using 3D-printing technology;Nickel;J Prosthet Orthot,2020

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. 3D PRINTED PROSTHESES: THE PATH FROM HYPE TO REALITY;CANADIAN PROSTHETICS & ORTHOTICS JOURNAL;2023-12-30

2. Functionality and Comfort Design of Lower-Limb Prosthetics: A Review;Journal of Disability Research;2023-09-15

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3