Affiliation:
1. College of the First Clinical, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China
2. Department of Rheumatism Immunology, Hubei Provincial Hospital of TCM, Wuhan, China
3. Department of Geriatrics, Hubei Provincial Hospital of TCM, Wuhan, China
4. Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Occurrence and Intervention of Rheumatic Diseases (Hubei Minzu University), Enshi, China.
Abstract
Background:
Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) is the most common secondary osteoporosis. Bushen Jiangu (BSJG), a classic traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) therapy, is widely used for treatment of GIOP. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of BSJG therapy on the treatment of GIOP.
Methods:
We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of BSJG therapy for GIOP in 10 databases. Methodological quality assessment was performed by using the Cochrane collaboration tool. RevMan v5.3 and Stata v14.0 software were used for performing data analysis. This study was conducted and reported following the PRISMA checklist.
Results:
Overall, 14 RCTs with 988 participants met the inclusion criteria. Pooled results indicated that BSJG therapy contributed to a betterment in improving the clinical efficacy rate of GIOP (risk ratio [RR] = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14, 1.30, P < .00001). The pooled results also indicated that BSJG therapy increased lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS-BMD) (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.33, P = .001), total hip bone mineral density (TH-BMD) (WMD = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.24, P < .0001), and femoral neck bone mineral density (FN-BMD) (WMD = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.10, P = .0001). Furthermore, our results indicated that BSJG therapy improved visual analogue scale (VAS) score (WMD = −0.60, 95% CI: −0.97, −0.23, P = .002), parathyroid hormone (PTH) (standardized mean difference [SMD] = −0.93, 95% CI: −1.58, −0.27, P = .006), and N-terminal propeptide of type I precollagen (PINP) (SMD = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.95, P < .00001). In terms of safety, there was no significant difference in the adverse events (AEs) between the 2 groups (RR = 1.45, 95% CI: 0.63, 3.31, P = .38).
Conclusion:
Our analysis indicates that BSJG therapy has a valid and safe effect on the treatment of GIOP in the clinic. However, the results need to be confirmed in more well-designed and large-scale RCTs.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)