Comparison of the effects of 5 and 10 L/minute fresh gas flow on emergence from sevoflurane anesthesia: A randomized clinical trial

Author:

Park Jun-Young1,Yu Jihion1,Kim Chan-Sik1,Baek Ji-Won2,Jo Yonggyeong1,Kim Young-Kug1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

2. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

Background: A high fresh gas flow of >5 L/minute is commonly used for emergence from inhalation anesthesia. In addition, a high fresh gas flow may have detrimental effects on climate change. However, no study has determined the optimal fresh gas flow for emergence from inhalation anesthesia. Therefore, we compared the effect of fresh gas flows of 5 L/minute and 10 L/minute on emergence time from sevoflurane anesthesia. Methods: Patients who were scheduled for transurethral resection of bladder tumor were randomly assigned to receive fresh gas flows of 5 L/minute (group 5) or 10 L/minute (group 10) during emergence. Emergence time was defined as the time from discontinuation of sevoflurane to tracheal extubation. The primary outcome was the emergence time, and the secondary outcomes were the time to self-movement and the time to eye-opening. Results: A total of 54 patients were included. In groups 5 and 10, emergence time (12.1 ± 2.9 minutes vs 11.1 ± 2.7 minutes, respectively; P = .232), time to self-movement (9.4 ± 3.8 minutes vs 8.5 ± 4.6 minutes, respectively; P = .435), and time to eye-opening (11.5 ± 3.1 minute vs 10.6 ± 3.0 minutes, respectively; P = .252) were not significantly different. Conclusions: Emergence time, time to self-movement, and time to eye opening were not significantly different between fresh gas flow rates of 5 L/minute and 10 L/minute in transurethral resection of bladder tumor, thus suggesting that fresh gas flow of 5 L/minute is sufficient for emergence from sevoflurane anesthesia. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05376631).

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3