Diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test for laboratory and non-laboratory medical professionals in real practice: A retrospective study

Author:

Lin Pei-Chin1,Huang Chun-Jung1,Lu Yen-Ming1,Huang Huei-Ling1,Wu Zong-Ying1,Chang Chih-Chun12,Chu Fang-Yeh1345ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Pathology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan

2. Department of Nursing, Cardinal Tien Junior College of Healthcare and Management, Yilan, Taiwan

3. Graduate School of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan

4. Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, Yuanpei University of Medical Technology, Hsinchu City, Taiwan

5. School of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan.

Abstract

Point-of-care tests for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) antigen detection have been widely used for rapid diagnosis in various settings. However, research on the diagnostic performance of the COVID-19 antigen test performed by non-laboratory personnel is limited. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen between laboratory professionals and non-laboratory staff. We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent both GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen testing and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) between November 01, 2021, and June 30, 2022. The diagnostic performance of the antigen test was compared between laboratory and non-laboratory operators, using RT-PCR as the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated and sensitivity analysis was performed based on the PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value. Of the 11,963 patients, 1273 (10.6%) tested positive using real-time RT-PCR. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test with 95% confidence interval were 79.92% (77.26%–82.39%), 99.23% (98.73%–99.57%), 103.25 (62.31–171.11), 0.2 (0.18–0.23), 510.18 (299.81–868.18), 98.11% (96.91%–98.85%), 90.75% (89.64%–91.75%) and 92.76% (91.76%–93.67%), respectively, for non–laboratory staff and 79.80% (74.78%–84.22%), 99.99% (99.94%–100.00%), 6983.92 (983.03–49617.00), 0.2 (0.16–0.25), 34566.45 (4770.30–250474.46) 99.58% (97.09%–99.94%), 99.32% (99.15%–99.46%), and 99.33% (99.13%–99.48%), respectively, for laboratory staff. Notably, when the PCR Ct value exceeded 25, the sensitivity of both the groups decreased to < 40%. The diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen performed by non-laboratory staff was comparable to that of laboratory professionals. However, it should be noted that the sensitivity of the antigen tests decreased when the PCR Ct value exceeded 25. Overall, the GenBody COVID-19 antigen test is a viable option for non-laboratory staff during an epidemic.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3