Comparison of subperiosteal or subgaleal drainage and subdural drainage in patients with chronic subdural hematoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Song Ling1,Zhou Kun2,Wang Cheng2,Chen Junquan2,Feng Bin2,Deng Xiaopeng2,Du Xiaolin2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy, The Jinyang Hospital Affiliated to Guizhou Medical University, Guizhou, China

2. Department of Neurosurgery, The Jinyang Hospital Affiliated to Guizhou Medical University, Guizhou, China.

Abstract

Background: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a relatively common disease, especially in the elderly, for which there is no clear standard of treatment available. The authors systematically evaluated the efficacy of various surgical procedures for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma. Methods: Electronic databases of PubMed, EmBase, Web of Science, Medicine, and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically. Based on the PRISMA template, we finally selected and analyzed 13 eligible papers to evaluate the effect of different drainage methods on CSDH. The primary outcomes were recurrence and clinical outcomes. Secondary outcomes were mortality and postoperative complications and other parameters. Results: The meta-analysis included 3 randomized controlled trials and 10 retrospective studies (non-randomized controlled trials) involving 3619 patients. The pooled results showed no statistically significant difference between non-subdural drainage (NSD) and subdural drainage (SD) in mortality and complication rates (P > 0.05). Additionally, overall pooled results showed that the use of NSD (10.9%) has a lower recurrence rate than the use of SD (11.7%), but the results were not statistically significant (relative risk ratio [RR] = 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70–1.45; I 2 = 47%; P = .92). However, the difference between NSD and SD in postoperative bleeding rate reached statistical significance (RR = 2.39; 95% CI = 1.31–4.36; I 2 = 0 %; P = .004). Subgroup analysis showed that SD was associated with similar recurrent CSDH (RR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.52–1.09; I 2 = 0%; P = .14), good recovery (RR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.93–1.04; I 2 = 0%; P = .50), and mortality (RR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.37–2.57; I 2 = 0%; P = .96), compared to NSD. Conclusions: These results suggest that NSD and SD are equally effective in the treatment of patients with CSDH, with no difference in final clinical characteristics and radiologic outcomes. However, in patients with limited subdural space after evacuation of a hematoma, NSD may be the preferred strategy to avoid iatrogenic brain injury.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3