Impact of anastomotic leakage on survival after surgery for gastric carcinoma: A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Zhang Lei1,Wang Beibei1,Huang Yi1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anorectal branch, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Zhongshan District, Dalian City, Liaoning Province, China.

Abstract

Background: The long-term survival of postoperative anastomotic leakage (AL) following gastric cancer (GC) surgery is still debating. Our aim was to investigate the association between AL and survival of the patients following GC. Methods: We searched articles in databases from inception to July 2023 to retrieve literature related to postoperative AL and survival of GC patients. We evaluated the association of postoperative AL and survival of GC patients using the software STAT10.0. Results: Seven articles with 6209 GC patients were included. Our results showed that the postoperative AL were associated with pooled 1-year patient overall survival (OS) result in an odds ratio (OR) of 0.504 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.372–0.682; I 2 = 84.1%; P = .000), pooled 3-year patient OS (OR = 0.467, 95% CI: 0.356–0.614; I 2 = 85.3%; P = .000) and pooled 5-year patient OS (OR = 0.370, 95% CI: 0.171–0.805; I 2 = 82.5%; P = .012). The P value of Egger test were 0.759, 0.187, 0.175. The postoperative AL were associated with pooled 1-year patient disease-free survival (DFS) result in an OR of 0.538 (95% CI: 0.171–1.691; I 2 = 89.0%; P = .289), the pooled 3-year patient DFS (OR = 0.143, 95% CI: 0.119–1.431; I 2 = 91.7%; P = .163), and the pooled 5-year patient DFS (OR = 0.344, 95% CI: 0.088–1.338; I 2 = 91.0%; P = .124), and the P value of Egger test of pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS were 0.759, 0.247, 0.07. Conclusion: Postoperative AL was correlated with a worse OS in GC patients, but not correlated with DFS in GC patients, but more studies are required to confirm this conclusion.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3