Factors associated with the use of traditional doses of amitriptyline for chronic pain management: A cross-sectional study

Author:

Koo Hyunji1,Jeong Kyeong Hye1,Jeon Nakyung2,Jung Sun-Young13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. College of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea

2. College of Pharmacy, Pusan National University, Pusan, Korea.

3. Department of Global Innovative Drugs, Graduate School of Chung-Ang University, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

There are studies on the effect of low-dose amitriptyline on pain control, but there is a lack of studies on the use of amitriptyline for chronic pain and the factors associated with the prescription of traditional doses. We used a national sample cohort of patients aged ≥ 18 years who were prescribed amitriptyline along with chronic pain, without psychiatric disorders, between 2002 to 2015. We categorized the prescriptions into 2 groups according to the daily dose: low doses (≤25 mg) and traditional doses (>25 mg). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with traditional dose prescriptions. Among 177,769 prescriptions for amitriptyline, 15,119 (8.5%) were prescribed for chronic pain. The prevalence of prescriptions and proportion of traditional doses of amitriptyline tended to decrease during the study period. Male sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–1.13); age 65–80 years (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.08–1.16), especially ≥ 80 years (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.45–1.65); headaches (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.10–1.27), receiving medical aids (OR 2.58, 95% CI 2.46–2.71); and being prescribed benzodiazepines or zolpidem concomitantly (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.06–1.15) were significantly associated with traditional dose prescriptions of amitriptyline. Although traditional dose prescriptions of amitriptyline have been declining, close monitoring is still required in the presence of the above-mentioned factors.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference58 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3