Three-dimensional printing versus traditional surgery for inveterate pelvic and acetabular fractures: A retrospective study of 37 patients

Abstract

Treatment of deformed pelvic and acetabular fractures is a considerable challenge for orthopedic surgeons. The aim of this study was to assess the availability of a three-dimensional (3D) printing model used in patients with inveterate pelvic and acetabular fractures by comparing 3D printing technology with conventional surgery. We conducted a retrospective review of patients with inveterate pelvic and acetabular fractures treated in our department between January 2008 and June 2020. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to their willingness. Perioperative data and clinical outcomes were compared to evaluate clinical efficacy. The t-test, Fisher exact test, and multivariable logistic regression analysis were conducted. A P value of .05 or less was considered to be statistically significant (two-tailed). Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in our study. Seventeen patients were divided into the case group treated by 3D printing model-assisted preoperative planning, and 20 patients were divided into the control group treated by conventional surgery. Patients treated with the 3D printing model had significantly shorter operation times, less blood loss, and shorter fluoroscopy times. Patients in the case group also showed better pain relief according to visual analog scale scores. However, the elevations in pelvis and hip joint functional outcomes were similar between the 2 groups, and no significant difference was shown in the radiological result. The usage of 3D printing techniques in patients with inveterate pelvic and acetabular fractures is of great importance in preoperative preparation and optimization of surgery but cannot improve postoperative function compared with conventional treatment.