A prospective study on the precision of height data from electronic medical records in tidal volume calculation for lung-protective ventilation

Author:

Mohamed Salman1,Batra Kavita23,Pang Nicole1,Runge Elliot4,Kioka Mutsumi John4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Kirk Kekorian School of Medicine at University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV

2. Office of Research, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV

3. Department of Medical Education and Office of Academic Affairs, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV

4. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV.

Abstract

Lung-protective ventilation is now the norm for all patients, regardless of the presence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), owing to the mortality associated with higher tidal volumes (TV). Clinicians calculate TV using recorded height from medical records and predicted body weight (PBW); however, the accuracy remains uncertain. Our study aimed to validate accurate TV settings for lung-protective ventilation by examining the correlation between the charted height and bedside measurements. In a single-center study, we compared PBW-based TV calculated from recorded height to PBW-based TV from measured height and identified factors causing height overestimation during charting. Our team measured patient height within 24 hours of admission using metal tape. TV calculated from recorded height (6–8 mL/kg PBW) was significantly larger (391.55 ± 65.98 to 522.07 ± 87.97) than measured height-based TV (162.62 ± 12.62 to 470.28 ± 89.64) (P < .01). In the height overestimated group, 57.7% were prescribed TV by healthcare provider, which was more than TV of 8 mL/kg of PBW, as determined by measured height. Negative predictors for height overestimation were male sex (OR: 0.45 [95% CI: 0.25–0.82]; P = .008) and presence of driver’s license information (OR: 0.45 [95% CI: 0.25–0.80]; P = .007), whereas Asian ethnicity was a positive predictor (OR: 4.34 [95% CI: 1.09–17.27]; P = .04). The height overestimation group had a higher in-patient mortality rate (38.5%) than the matched/underestimation group (20%) (P < .01). In stadiometer-limited hospitals, the PBW-based TV is overestimated using the recorded height instead of the measured height. In the group where heights were overestimated, over half of the patients received TV prescriptions from healthcare providers that surpassed the TV of calculated 8 mL/kg PBW based on their measured height. The risk factors for height overestimation include female sex, Asian ethnicity, and missing driver’s license data. Alternative height measurement methods should be explored to ensure precise ventilation settings and patient safety.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3