The effect of non-contrast enhanced MRA on patients with renal insufficiency and foot pain

Author:

Wu Gang1,Yang Yongli2,Liu Liangjin3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China

2. Internal Medicine of Nephropathy, Hubei No.3 People’s Hospital of Jianghan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China

3. Department of Radiology, Hubei No.3 People’s Hospital of Jianghan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Abstract

To investigate the feasibility of non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography of arteries and veins (NATIVE) sampling perfection with application optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolution (SPACE) and quiescent interval single shot (QISS) in assessing foot arteries of patients with renal insufficiency and foot pain. Fifty-three patients (mean age = 44.2 ± 11.4 years, male: female = 27:26) underwent QISS and NATIVE-SPACE. The source images were reconstructed to maximum intensity projection and volume render. The image quality of QISS and NATIVE-SPACE was rated (0–3, poor to excellent), and was compared using Wilcoxon test. True or false positive was determined by comparing the findings of QISS and NATIVE-SPACE. The relative signal intensity of artery was obtained for each case, and was compared between QISS and NATIVE-SPACE using Mann Whitney test. The acquisition time of NATIVE-SPACE was significantly longer than that of QISS (178.4 ± 35.7 seconds vs 45.4 ± 8.9 seconds, P < .001). QISS had significantly lower image quality score versus NATIVE-SPACE (1.4 ± 0.5 vs 2.4 ± 0.6, P = .02). Fifteen percentage (8/53) NATIVE-SPACE cases had poor image quality due to the similarity of peak flow and minimum flow. The relative signal intensity was significantly lower in QISS versus NATIVE-SPACE (9.7 ± 1.3 vs 68.2 ± 12.4, P < .001). NATIVE-SPACE is valuable in evaluating foot arteries of patients with renal insufficiency. QISS can serve as an alternative test to NATIVE-SPACE.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3