Diagnostic criteria and scoring systems for thyroid storm: An evaluation of their utility – comparative review

Author:

Elendu Chukwuka1ORCID,Amaechi Dependable C.2,Amaechi Emmanuel C.3,Chima-Ogbuiyi Nkechi L.4,Afuh Rechner N.5,Arrey Agbor Divine B.6,Abdi Mohamed Abdirahman7,Nwachukwu Nwachukwu O.8,Oderinde Oluwatobi O.9,Elendu Tochi C.10,Elendu Ijeoma D.10,Akintunde Akinbayo A.11,Onyekweli Samuel O.9,Omoruyi Gloria O.9

Affiliation:

1. University of California, Santa Cruz, CA

2. Igbinedion University, Okada, Nigeria

3. Madonna University, Elele, Nigeria

4. Herzing University, Madison, WI

5. University Hospitals, Plymouth, England

6. Richmond University Medical Center, Staten Island, NY

7. Vinnytsia National Pirogov Medical University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine

8. Saint Nicholas Hospital, Surulere, Nigeria

9. Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria

10. Imo State University, Owerri, Nigeria

11. Babcock University, Ilishan-Remo, Nigeria.

Abstract

A thyroid storm is a life-threatening endocrine emergency characterized by severe hyperthyroidism and many systemic manifestations. Prompt recognition and treatment are essential for patient survival. This study evaluates the utility of existing diagnostic criteria and scoring systems for thyroid storm. A comprehensive literature review encompassed articles published up to December 2023. Various diagnostic criteria and scoring systems, such as the Burch–Wartofsky Point Scale and the Japanese Thyroid Association criteria, were critically assessed based on their sensitivity, specificity, and clinical applicability. Our findings reveal that existing diagnostic criteria and scoring systems, although valuable tools, exhibit limitations. They may lack sensitivity in identifying milder cases of thyroid storm or fail to differentiate it from other critical conditions. Furthermore, some criteria rely heavily on subjective clinical Judgment, which can vary among healthcare providers. Future research should focus on refining existing criteria and developing more objective and universally applicable diagnostic tools to address these limitations. Incorporating advanced laboratory markers and modern imaging techniques may enhance diagnostic accuracy. Additionally, a standardized scoring system approach could improve clinical practice consistency. In conclusion, while current diagnostic criteria and scoring systems provide a foundation for identifying thyroid storm, their utility has shortcomings. Advancements in diagnostic methods and a collaborative effort to establish standardized criteria are imperative to enhance the accuracy and reliability of thyroid storm diagnosis, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference24 articles.

1. New biomarkers: prospect for diagnosis and monitoring of thyroid disease.;Macvanin;Front Endocrinol (Lausanne),2023

2. Application of machine learning algorithms to predict the thyroid disease risk: an experimental comparative study.;Islam;PeerJ Comput Sci,2022

3. A systematic review on artificial intelligence techniques for detecting thyroid diseases.;Aversano;PeerJ Comput Sci,2023

4. Thyroid storm in pediatrics: a systematic review.;Abisad;J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab,2022

5. Clinical review and update on the management of thyroid storm.;De Almeida;Mo Med,2022

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3