Affiliation:
1. School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
2. University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, HI.
Abstract
Introduction:
The efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan versus olmesartan remains controversial for the control of hypertension. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of sacubitril/valsartan versus olmesartan on the control of hypertension.
Methods:
We have searched PubMed, Embase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through July 2023 for randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of sacubitril/valsartan versus olmesartan on the control of hypertension. This meta-analysis is performed using the random-effect model or fixed-effect model based on the heterogeneity.
Results:
Seven randomized controlled trials and 3677 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with olmesartan treatment for hypertension, sacubitril/valsartan treatment was associated with substantially decreased systolic blood pressure (mean difference [MD] = −4.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] = −7.90 to −1.25; P = .007), diastolic blood pressure (MD = −1.70; 95% CI = −3.24 to −0.17; P = .03), and pulse pressure (MD = −2.31; 95% CI = −4.41 to −0.21; P = .03), as well as improved systolic blood pressure control (odds ratio [OR] = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.15 to 2.38; P = .006), but had no influence on diastolic blood pressure control (OR = 1.33; 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.88; P = .11) or adverse events (OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.24; P = .51).
Conclusions:
Sacubitril/valsartan is better than olmesartan for the reduction of blood pressure for patients with hypertension.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)