Effectiveness and safety of Buzzy device in needle-related procedures for children under twelve years of age: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Jin Faguang1,Wang Xiaofang1,Qi Maomao2,Zhang Wenhua2,Zhang Yongfeng2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Medical College, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China

2. Department of Pediatrics, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China.

Abstract

Background: Pain transcends simple physiology, encompassing biological, emotional, psychological, and social facets. Children show pronounced immediate and enduring responses to pain-related procedures. The aim of this meta-analysis is to investigate the efficacy and safety of the Buzzy device for needle-related procedures in children aged twelve years or younger. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched from inception to July 2023. Only randomized controlled trials utilizing the Buzzy device for needle-related procedures in children under twelve years old were included. Two reviewers independently conducted study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Random-effects models were utilized, and analyses were performed using mean differences or standardized mean differences as well as risk ratios. Results: A total of 19 studies were included, involving 2846 participants (Buzzy = 1095, Control = 1751). Compared to no intervention, the Buzzy device significantly reduced pain response [self-report SMD = −1.90 (−2.45, −1.36), parental SMD = −3.04 (−4.09, −1.99), observer SMD = −2.88 (−3.75, −2.02)] and anxiety scores [self-report SMD = −1.97 (−3.05, −0.88), parental SMD = −2.01 (−2.93, −1.08), observer SMD = −1.92 (−2.64, −1.19)]. Compared to virtual reality (VR), the Buzzy device reduced self-reported anxiety levels SMD = −0.47 (−0.77, −0.17), and compared to distraction cards, the Buzzy device reduced parental and observer-reported pain [parental SMD = −0.85 (−1.22, −0.48), observer SMD = −0.70 (−1.00, −0.40)] and anxiety [parental SMD = −0.96 (−1.46, −0.47), observer SMD = −0.91 (−1.40, −0.42)]. Subgroup analysis results showed that procedure type, patient age, measurement scales used, and distance of operation were not the reason of heterogeneity. The summarized first puncture attempt success rate did not differ from other interventions. There were no significant adverse events in the included studies. Conclusion: The Buzzy device reduces pain and anxiety in children during needle procedures, ensuring success and safety. Additionally, the effectiveness of the Buzzy device in reducing pain during venipuncture is superior when compared to its effectiveness during intramuscular injections.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3