Comparison of maternal neonatal outcomes of normotensive and hypertensive placental abruptions: A novel approach

Author:

Akkaya Hatice1ORCID,Uysal Gulsum2ORCID,Yilmaz Gamze1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health Adana City Hospital, Adana, Turkey.

Abstract

To analyze maternal and neonatal effects of placental abruption (PA) through a novel classification in the presence of hypertension. Initial hemoglobin parameters were also compared to predict pregnancy outcomes in addition to hypertension. This retrospective cohort designed study was conducted on 115 pregnant women with PA. The main parameters scanned and recorded from the hospital database and patient medical files. Two groups were classified regarding of presence or absence of hypertension (53 hypertensive, 62 normotensive). Maternal demographical and clinical characteristics (abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding) were recorded. APGAR scores below 5 at 1st and 5th minute, fetal or neonatal death, admission and length of stay in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit were also investigated and compared between the groups. Stillborn to live-born ratio and lower APGAR scores < 5 at 5th minute were significantly higher in hypertensive group than normotensive group (P = .006 and 0.047, respectively). Poor maternal outcomes were detected in the hypertensive group than normotensive group regarding rate of blood transfusion (27/53, 50.9%; 18/62, 29%, respectively, P = .017). More abdominal pain and less vaginal bleeding were seen in PA with HT. Higher lymphocyte count, mean platelet volume, and platelet distribution width were reported in hypertensive group. Poorer maternal and neonatal outcomes of hypertensive patients with PA were detected. These patients should deserve greater attention to assess not only the possible risks associated with abruption but also the accompanying complications.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3