The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Calcium Scoring in Standard Cardiac Computed Tomography and Chest Computed Tomography With Different Reconstruction Kernels

Author:

Lin Yenpo1,Lin Gigin1,Peng Meng-Ting2,Kuo Chi-Tai3,Wan Yung-Liang1,Cherng Wen-Jin3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention

2. Division of Hematology and Oncology

3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine; Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the correlation of coronary calcium score (CS) obtained by artificial intelligence (AI) with those obtained by electrocardiography gated standard cardiac computed tomography (CCT) and nongated chest computed tomography (ChCT) with different reconstruction kernels. Patients and Methods: Seventy-six patients received standard CCT and ChCT simultaneously. We compared CS obtained in 4 groups: CSCCT, by the traditional method from standard CCT, 25 cm field of view, 3 mm slice thickness, and kernel filter convolution 12 (FC12); CSAICCT, by AI from the standard CCT; CSChCTsoft, by AI from the non-gated CCT, 40 cm field of view, 3 mm slice thickness, and a soft kernel FC02; and CSChCTsharp, by AI from CCT image with same parameters for CSChCTsoft except for using a sharp kernel FC56. Statistical analyses included Spearman rank correlation coefficient (ρ), intraclass correlation (ICC), Bland–Altman plots, and weighted kappa analysis (κ). Results: The CSAICCT was consistent with CSCCT (ρ = 0.994 and ICC of 1.00, P < 0.001) with excellent agreement with respect to cardiovascular (CV) risk categories of the Agatston score (κ = 1.000). The correlation between CSChCTsoft and CSChCTsharp was good (ρ = 0.912, 0.963 and ICC = 0.929, 0.948, respectively, P < 0.001) with a tendency of underestimation (Bland–Altman mean difference and 95% upper and lower limits of agreements were 329.1 [–798.9 to 1457] and 335.3 [–651.9 to 1322], respectively). The CV risk category agreement between CSChCTsoft and CSChCTsharp was moderate (κ = 0.556 and 0.537, respectively). Conclusions: There was an excellent correlation between CSCCT and CSAICCT, with excellent agreement between CV risk categories. There was also a good correlation between CSCCT and CS obtained by ChCT albeit with a tendency for underestimation and moderate accuracy in terms of CV risk assessment.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3