Endophthalmitis Management Study—A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial on Postoperative Endophthalmitis Management in India: An Interim Analysis. Endophthalmitis Management Study Report #3

Abstract

Purpose: An interim analysis of the Endophthalmitis Management Study to examine the outcome of inflammation score (IS)–based treatment and antibiotic susceptibility. Design: A prospective randomized study. Patients and Methods: IS was measured on a 0–4 scale from presenting signs in 4 cardinal ocular tissues. The eyes with IS <10 received vitreous tap and intravitreal antibiotics, whereas eyes with IS ≥10 received vitrectomy and intravitreal antibiotics. These eyes were randomized to 2 intravitreal antibiotic combinations: (1) vancomycin and ceftazidime and (2) vancomycin and imipenem. Microbiology workup of undiluted vitreous included microscopy, culture-susceptibility, Sanger, and targeted next-generation sequencing. The clinical and microbiology outcomes were analyzed for advanced (IS = ≥20) and less advanced (IS = <10) endophthalmitis. Results: Interim analysis was performed after the Endophthalmitis Management Study recruited 56.85% (248/436) of patients and completed 54.6% (238/436) of microbiology workup. A 90-day follow-up was completed in 90.8% (168/185) of eligible people. In eyes with IS ≥20, the time to symptoms was shorter (5.8 ± 6.7 vs 8.5 ± 9.1 d; P = 0.015), and the need for additional treatment was higher (95.8% vs 53.1%; P = 0.0267). Good final vision was associated with good presenting vision (r = 0.30) and IS-based treatment decisions (r = 0.170). Microbiology positivity was 55.9%. Eyes with IS <10 had a higher Gram-positive cocci (33.9% vs 4.8%; P = 0.013) infection. Gram-positive cocci were most susceptible to vancomycin (95.7%), and Gram-negative bacilli to colistin (95.7%). Conclusions: Considering both IS and presenting vision, rather than only one of them, helps in making appropriate management decisions for acute postoperative endophthalmitis.