European Society of Hypertension recommendations for the validation of cuffless blood pressure measuring devices: European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability

Author:

Stergiou George S.1,Avolio Alberto P.2,Palatini Paolo3,Kyriakoulis Konstantinos G.1,Schutte Aletta E.4,Mieke Stephan5,Kollias Anastasios1,Parati Gianfranco67,Asmar Roland8,Pantazis Nikos9,Stamoulopoulos Achilleas9,Asayama Kei10,Castiglioni Paolo11,De La Sierra Alejandro12,Hahn Jin-Oh13,Kario Kazuomi14,McManus Richard J.15,Myers Martin16,Ohkubo Takayoshi10,Shroff Sanjeev G.17,Tan Isabella18,Wang Jiguang19,Zhang Yuanting20,Kreutz Reinhold21,O’Brien Eoin22,Mukkamala Ramakrishna23

Affiliation:

1. Hypertension Center STRIDE-7, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Third Department of Medicine, Sotiria Hospital, Athens, Greece

2. Macquarie Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

3. Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy

4. School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

5. Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Berlin, Germany

6. Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca

7. Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Cardiology Unit and Department of Cardiovascular, Neural and Metabolic Sciences, S. Luca Hospital, Milan, Italy

8. Foundation-Medical Research Institutes, Geneva, Switzerland

9. Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology & Medical Statistics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece

10. Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

11. IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus, Milan, Italy; Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences (DBSV), University of Insubria, Varese, Italy

12. Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Mutua Terrassa, University of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

13. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA

14. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan

15. Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

16. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

17. Department of Bioengineering and Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

18. The George Institute for Global Health, Macquarie Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

19. The Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai

20. Hong Kong Centre for Cerebro-Cardiovascular Health Engineering (COCHE), Hong Kong, China

21. Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany

22. The Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

23. Department of Bioengineering and Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Abstract

Background: There is intense effort to develop cuffless blood pressure (BP) measuring devices, and several are already on the market claiming that they provide accurate measurements. These devices are heterogeneous in measurement principle, intended use, functions, and calibration, and have special accuracy issues requiring different validation than classic cuff BP monitors. To date, there are no generally accepted protocols for their validation to ensure adequate accuracy for clinical use. Objective: This statement by the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) Working Group on BP Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability recommends procedures for validating intermittent cuffless BP devices (providing measurements every >30 sec and usually 30–60 min, or upon user initiation), which are most common. Validation procedures: Six validation tests are defined for evaluating different aspects of intermittent cuffless devices: static test (absolute BP accuracy); device position test (hydrostatic pressure effect robustness); treatment test (BP decrease accuracy); awake/asleep test (BP change accuracy); exercise test (BP increase accuracy); and recalibration test (cuff calibration stability over time). Not all these tests are required for a given device. The necessary tests depend on whether the device requires individual user calibration, measures automatically or manually, and takes measurements in more than one position. Conclusion: The validation of cuffless BP devices is complex and needs to be tailored according to their functions and calibration. These ESH recommendations present specific, clinically meaningful, and pragmatic validation procedures for different types of intermittent cuffless devices to ensure that only accurate devices will be used in the evaluation and management of hypertension.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Physiology,Internal Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3