Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument Scores Within Gross Motor Function Classification Scale Levels and Functional Mobility Scale Ratings in Individuals With Cerebral Palsy

Author:

Ciccodicola Eva1,Liang Adriana1,Kay Robert M.12,Wren Tishya A.L.12

Affiliation:

1. Jackie and Gene Autry Orthopedic Center, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles

2. Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA

Abstract

Background and Objective: The Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) is a patient/parent-reported outcome measure used in children with cerebral palsy (CP). PODCI score variability has not been widely examined in patients of Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level IV or using the Functional Mobility Scale (FMS). The purpose of this study is to examine the distribution of PODCI scores within patients with CP GMFCS levels I-IV and FMS levels 1-6. Methods: Retrospectively identified patients with CP whose parent/caregiver had completed the PODCI at their visit were grouped based on GMFCS and FMS level. One-way ANOVA with pairwise Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc tests was performed to compare the effect of GMFCS and FMS levels (1, 2-4, 5, or 6) on PODCI scores. Results: Three hundred sixty-seven patients were included (128 female, 11.7 years, SD 3.6). Global, Sports, Transfer, and Upper Extremity scores differed among all GMFCS levels (P≤0.056) and were significantly lower for GMFCS IV compared with all other levels. Happiness, Expectations, and Pain scores did not differ significantly among GMFCS levels including level IV (P>0.06). Similar trends were seen at all FMS distances (5, 50, and 500âm). At 50âm, Global, Sports, Transfer, and Upper Extremity scores differed significantly among all FMS levels (P<0.001) except that Upper Extremity Scores were similar between levels 2-4 and level 5 (P=1.00). Happiness and Pain scores were not different between FMS levels (P>0.27). Expectations scores differed only between FMS 1 and FMS 6 with FMS 6 being higher at the 50-m distance only (P=0.03). Conclusions: Parent-reported outcome measures are important for providing patient-centered care. Providers can examine these measures alongside functional classification systems to create a more complete clinical picture of the patient. Providers should be aware of the score trends seen in our results when evaluating the PODCI for individuals with CP to improve shared decision-making and better monitor their need for future care. Level of Evidence: Level III—retrospective study.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3