Closing-wedge Osteotomies: Can We Do and Teach Better?

Author:

Weltsch Daniel12,Juels Michaela3,Chen Kevin Yining3,Talathi Nakul4,Silva Mauricio4,Thompson Rachel M.4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chaim Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer, Tel Hashomer

2. UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine

3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UCLA

4. Department of Orthopaedics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA

Abstract

Background: Wedge osteotomies are ubiquitous in pediatric orthopaedics and limb deformity surgery; however, there is no universally preferred methodology for these procedures. This study aims to determine the relative accuracy and effectiveness of several measuring and marking methods to guide best practices for wedge-shaped osteotomies in long bones. Methods: An observational cohort study was completed. Orthopaedic residents (postgraduate years 1 to 5) completed 30-degree wedge osteotomies on a sawbone (Pacific Research Lab) femur utilizing a standard oscillating saw under 3 measuring conditions: (1) no measurement tool, (2) 30-degree triangle, and (3) goniometer, in combination with 2 different marking methods: (1) marking pen or (2) pin placement. Demographic characteristics and osteotomy performance (quality, completion time, and accuracy) were assessed. Quality was ranked as perfect (1), mild step-off (2), or gross surface irregularity (3). Multivariate regressions and analysis of variance were performed comparing demographics, osteotomy performance, and measuring methods. Results: Twenty-four residents were included for analysis; 6 were female (25%). Female sex was independently associated with longer completion time when evaluating all combined scenarios (138 vs. 99 s, P=0.003) without differences in surface quality or angle accuracy. There were no significant associations between measuring technique and accuracy or surface quality, but use of the goniometer and the triangle both were associated with significantly longer completion time compared with no visual aid (P=0.002 and 0.007). When controlling for measuring technique, use of the pen as a marking technique had significantly shorter completion times (P<0.001), higher surface quality (P<0.001), and better accuracy (P<0.001) than guide pins. Conclusions: We recommend the use of a marking pen in combination with the surgeon’s preferred measuring guide to optimize trainees’ performance of closing wedge osteotomies. Future research is necessary to corroborate these findings in a higher fidelity setting, such as a cadaveric study. Further, while male residents complete wedge osteotomies quicker than female residents, quality and accuracy are comparable among trainees. Slower pace should not be conflated with poor performance but rather should inform effective intraoperative teaching for diverse trainees.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3