Do Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients With Vitamin D Deficiency Have Worse Spine Fusion Outcomes?

Abstract

Background: Prior research has shown that patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have a higher prevalence of vitamin D deficiency compared with healthy peers. In adult orthopaedic populations, vitamin D deficiency has been shown to be a risk factor for higher reported pain and lower function. We investigated whether there was an association between vitamin D levels and AIS patient-reported outcomes, as measured by the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-30) questionnaire. Methods: This was a single-center, cross-sectional study. Postoperative AIS patients were prospectively recruited during routine follow-up visits, 2 to 10 years after spine fusion. Vitamin D levels were measured by serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (ng/mL). Patients were categorized based on vitamin D level: deficient (<20 ng/mL), insufficient (20 to 29 ng/mL), or sufficient (≥30 ng/mL). The correlation between vitamin D levels and SRS-30 scores was analyzed using multivariable analysis and pair-wise comparisons using Tukey method. Results: Eighty-seven AIS patients (83% female) were enrolled who presented at median 3 years (interquartile range: 2 to 5 y; range: 2 to 10 y) after spine fusion. Age at time of surgery was mean 15 (SD±2) years. Major coronal curves were a mean of 57 (SD±8) degrees preoperatively and 18 (SD±7) degrees postoperatively. It was found that 30 (34%) of patients were vitamin D sufficient, 33 (38%) were insufficient, and 24 (28%) were deficient. Although there was no correlation between vitamin D level and Pain, Mental Health, or Satisfaction domains (P>0.05), vitamin D–deficient patients were found to be younger (P<0.001) and had lower SRS-30 function (P=0.002), Self-image (P<0.001), and total scores (P=0.003). Conclusions: AIS patients with vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL) are more likely to be younger age at time of surgery, and report lower Function, Self-image, and Total SRS-30 scores postoperatively. Further work is needed to determine whether vitamin D supplementation alters curve progression and patient outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level II—prognostic study.