Development, Implementation, and Provider Perception of Standardized Critical Event Debriefing in a Pediatric Emergency Department

Author:

Grither Allie1,Leonard Kathryn1,Whiteley Jill2,Ahmad Fahd1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

2. Emergency Department, Saint Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, MO.

Abstract

ObjectiveHot debriefings are communications among team members occurring shortly after an event. They have been shown to improve team performance and communication. Best practice guidelines encourage hot debriefings, but these are often not routinely performed. We aim to describe the development and implementation of a multidisciplinary hot debriefing process in our pediatric emergency department (ED), and its impact on hot debriefing completion and provider perceptions.MethodsAn internal tool and protocol for hot debriefings were developed by integrating responses from a survey of those who work in the ED at our institution and previously published debriefing tools. Charge nurses and pediatric emergency medicine physicians were trained to lead hot debriefings. Surveys on the perception of hot debriefings were administered before and 6 months postimplementation.Twelve-month baseline data were established by asking physicians who cared for patients who died in the ED or within 48 hours of admission to recall debrief completion. Debriefs were then prospectively tracked for 6 months postimplementation.ResultsDebrief completion for patient deaths in the ED or within 48 hours of admission increased from 23% (5/22) to 75% (12/16) (P< 0.001). When assessing just those deaths within the ED, this number increased from 31% (5/16) to 85% (11/13) (P< 0.001).There were 98 responses to a baseline survey (response rate, 60.5%). Most who were surveyed felt that debriefs rarely occurred, preferred hot debriefings to cold debriefings, and felt that more hot debriefings should occur. Perceived barriers included lack of time, interest, protocol, trained facilitators, departmental support, and inability to gather the team.There were 88 responses to a postintervention survey (response rate, 56.8%), 50 of which had participated in a debrief and were included in analysis. Those surveyed felt that debriefs occurred more often and were more often valuable. Most perceived that barriers were significantly reduced. Most respondents felt that hot debriefs helped address systems issues and improved performance.ConclusionsImplementation of a protocol for physician or charge nurse-led hot debriefings in our pediatric ED resulted in increased completion, perceived barrier reduction, and a uniform approach to address identified issues. Pediatric EDs should consider adoption of a hot debriefing protocol given these benefits.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine,Emergency Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference27 articles.

1. Academic emergency physicians' experiences with patient death;Acad Emerg Med,2011

2. Emergency nurses' perceptions of critical incidents and stress debriefing;J Emerg Nurs,1993

3. Emergency physicians' experience with pediatric death;Am J Emerg Med,1997

4. Implementing an ED critical incident stress management team;J Emerg Nurs,2016

5. Part 4: systems of care and continuous quality improvement: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care;Circulation,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3