Referrals for Pediatric Appendicitis to a Tertiary Care Children's Hospital

Author:

McNulty Ellie1,Greene Alicia2,Boehmer Susan J.3,Tsai Anthony4,Olympia Robert P.5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA

2. Department of General Surgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA

3. Department of Public Health Services, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA

4. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Penn State Children's Hospital, Hershey, PA

5. Department of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center and Penn State Children's Hospital, Hershey, PA

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to analyze pediatric referrals for definite or possible appendicitis, to compare clinical predictors and laboratory values between patients with and without a final diagnosis of appendicitis, and to determine the accuracy of prereferral diagnostic interpretations of computed tomography scans, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging modalities. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of pediatric patients referred from 2015 to 2019 to a tertiary care children's emergency department with definitive or possible appendicitis. Data abstracted included patient demographics, clinical symptoms, physical examination findings, laboratory results, and diagnostic imaging findings (by the referring center and the pediatric radiologist at the accepting center). An Alvarado and Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) score was calculated for each patient. Results Analysis was performed on 381 patients; 226 (59%) had a final diagnosis of appendicitis. Patients with appendicitis were more likely to have symptoms of nausea (P < 0.0001) and vomiting (P < 0.0001), have a higher mean temperature (P = 0.025), right lower quadrant abdominal pain to palpation (P = <0.0001), rebound tenderness (P < 0.0001), a higher mean Alvarado score [5.35 vs 3.45 (P < 0.0001)], and a higher mean AIR score [4.02 vs 2.17 (P < 0.0001)]. Of the 97 diagnostic images initially interpreted as appendicitis by the referring center, 10 (10.3%) were read as no evidence of appendicitis. Of the 62 diagnostic images initially interpreted as “possible appendicitis” by the referring center, 34 (54.8%) were read as no evidence of appendicitis. Of those diagnostic images initially interpreted as “appendicitis” or “possible appendicitis” by the referring center, 24/89 (27.0%) of computed tomography scans, 17/62 (27.4%) of ultrasounds, and 3/8 (37.5%) of magnetic resonance imaging results were read as no evidence of appendicitis. Conclusions Usage of established scoring algorithms, such as Alvarado and AIR, may decrease the unnecessary cost of diagnostic imaging and transfer to tertiary care. Virtual radiology consultations may be 1 potential solution to improve the referral process for pediatric appendicitis if initial interpretation is uncertain.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine,Emergency Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3