Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Fentanyl in Pediatric Emergencies

Author:

Alsabri Mohammed1,Hafez Abdelrahman H.2,Singer Emad3,Elhady Mahmoud M.4,Waqar Muhammad5,Gill Paviter6

Affiliation:

1. Pediatric Emergency Department, Woodhull Hospital, New York, NY

2. Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt

3. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

4. Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Qalubiya, Egypt

5. Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA

6. Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.

Abstract

Background Intranasal fentanyl (INF) has gained popularity in pediatric emergency departments (EDs) as an effective alternative to intravenous morphine for treating acute moderate to severe pain. Intranasal fentanyl eliminates the need for invasive access, making it advantageous for patients with minor injuries. Our study aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the available evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of INF administration in pediatric emergency wards, particularly compared with other treatment options described in the literature. Methods A thorough search strategy identified randomized controlled trials assessing INF in the pediatric emergency ward. Eligible studies were independently screened, and relevant data were extracted. The analysis used pooled risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and the standardized mean difference (SMD) for continuous ones. Randomized controlled trials' quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool 2. Results In our study, 8 randomized controlled trials involving 806 patients, INF demonstrated superior effectiveness in reducing pain compared with other comparators at the 15- to 20-minute mark (SMD, −0.23; 95% confidence interval, −0.37 to −0.08; P = 0.002). However, no significant differences were found at the 30- and 60-minute time points (SMDs, −0.16; 95% CI, −0.50, 0.19; P = 0.37; and −0.16; 95% CI, −0.50 to 0.19; P = 0.78) except when excluding one study to resolve heterogeneity at the 30-minute mark (RR, −0.02; 95% CI, −0.24 to 0.20; P = 0.87). Intranasal fentanyl also exhibited a better adverse outcome profile, with a lower risk of total adverse events and nausea/vomiting (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48–0.91; P = 0.01; and RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.30–0.63; P > 0.001) compared with other analgesics. However, no significant differences were observed for dizziness and hallucination (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.30–0.63; P = 0.68; and RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.30–0.63; P = 0.35). Conclusions Our study assessed the effectiveness of INF compared with other analgesics in pain reduction. Intranasal fentanyl demonstrated superior pain reduction at the 15- to 20-minute point but showed no significant differences at 30 and 60 minutes. Intranasal fentanyl also had a more favorable adverse event profile, with a lower risk of nausea and vomiting than other analgesics. However, no significant differences were observed in dizziness and hallucination between the groups.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3