The Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Pediatric Emergency Departments and Intensive Care Units

Author:

Şık Nihan1ORCID,Arslan Gazi2,Akca Çağlar Ayla3,Ülgen Tekerek Nazan4,Fidancı İlknur5,Tolu Kendir Özlem6,Bal Alkan7,Özgür Horoz Özden8,Anıl Ayşe Berna9,Yıldızdaş Dinçer8,Duman Murat10,Dursun Oğuz4

Affiliation:

1. Pediatric Emergency Department, Balikesir Ataturk City Hospital, Balikesir, Turkey

2. Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey

3. Pediatric Emergency Department, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

4. Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey

5. Pediatric Emergency Department, Ankara Research and Training Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

6. Pediatric Emergency Department, Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey

7. Pediatric Emergency Department, Manisa Celal Bayar University Faculty of Medicine, Hafsa Sultan Hospital, Manisa, Turkey

8. Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey

9. Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Izmir Katip Celebi Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey

10. Pediatric Emergency Department, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.

Abstract

Objectives The aim was to evaluate the current status of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), perceptions, education, training, and barriers to using POCUS in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) and pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in Turkey. Methods A descriptive, multicenter, cross-sectional study through an online survey was developed using the REDCap online platform. The survey was distributed through the Turkish Society of Pediatric Emergency and Intensive Care e-mail group. Each survey was answered only once by each PED/PICU and by the clinical chief of the department. Results A total of 19 PEDs and 26 PICUs responded to the survey. Among them, 84.2% of PEDs and 100% of PICUs reported the clinical use of POCUS. For diagnostic applications, the most common areas for PEDs and PICUs were thoracic (93.7%/100%) and cardiovascular (62.5%/65.4%) assessment, and in the procedural use of POCUS, the most frequent applications were those for vascular access (75.0%/92.3%) and thoracentesis (31.2%/65.4%). The most commonly reported clinical benefits were rapid diagnosis, rapid treatment, and decreased complications during procedural applications for PEDs and PICUs. Evaluating the barriers to POCUS use in PEDs and PICUs, the most common reasons for insufficient use were the lack of ultrasound machines and/or equipment, a shortage of manpower, lack of awareness, and lack of training. For PEDs (68.4%) and for PICUs (84.6%), participants agreed that POCUS training should be mandatory during fellowship programs. Conclusions Most participants were aware of the need for POCUS. However, lack of education, equipment, manpower, and infrastructure still emerged as barriers to the use of POCUS. To further promote POCUS use, it would be helpful to improve accessibility by ensuring sufficient numbers of ultrasound devices together with sufficient numbers of appointed physicians and by expanding POCUS education in PEDs and PICUs.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3