Evaluation of the Resources and Inequities Among Pediatric Critical Care Facilities in Pakistan

Author:

Abbas Qalab1,Shahbaz Fatima Farrukh1,Hussain Muhammad Zaid H.1,Khan Mustafa Ali2,Shahbaz Hamna2,Atiq Huba3,Siddiqui Naveed ur Rehman1,Gowa Murtaza Ali4,Jamil Muhammad Tariq5,Ali Farman6,Khan Ata Ullah7,Ahmed Abdul Rahim8,Haque Anwar ul9,Hamid Muhammad Haroon10,Latif Asad3,Bhutta Adnan11

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

2. Dean’s Office, Medical College, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

3. Department of Anesthesiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

4. Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, National Institute of Child Health, Karachi, Pakistan.

5. Department of Pediatrics, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

6. Department of Pediatrics, Peshawar Institute of Cardiology, Peshawar, Pakistan.

7. Department of Pediatrics, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.

8. Department of Pediatrics, Indus Hospital Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan.

9. Department of Pediatrics, Sind Institute of Child Health, Karachi, Pakistan.

10. Department of Pediatrics, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.

11. Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate nationwide pediatric critical care facilities and resources in Pakistan. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. SETTING: Accredited pediatric training facilities in Pakistan. PATIENTS: None. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A survey was conducted using the Partners in Health 4S (space, staff, stuff, systems) framework, via email or telephone correspondence. We used a scoring system in which each item in our checklist was given a score of 1, if available. Total scores were added up for each component. Additionally, we stratified and analyzed the data between the public and private healthcare sectors. Out of 114 hospitals (accredited for pediatric training), 76 (67%) responded. Fifty-three (70%) of these hospitals had a PICU, with a total of 667 specialized beds and 217 mechanical ventilators. There were 38 (72%) public hospitals and 15 (28%) private hospitals. There were 20 trained intensivists in 16 of 53 PICUs (30%), while 25 of 53 PICUs (47%) had a nurse-patient ratio less than 1:3. Overall, private hospitals were better resourced in many domains of our four Partners in Health framework. The Stuff component scored more than the other three components using analysis of variance testing (p = 0.003). On cluster analysis, private hospitals ranked higher in Space and Stuff, along with the overall scoring. CONCLUSIONS: There is a general lack of resources, seen disproportionately in the public sector. The scarcity of qualified intensivists and nursing staff poses a challenge to Pakistan’s PICU infrastructure.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3