A Prognostic Model for Critically Ill Children in Locations With Emerging Critical Care Capacity

Author:

Chandna Arjun12,Keang Suy13,Vorlark Meas3,Sambou Bran1,Chhingsrean Chhay1,Sina Heav1,Vichet Pav1,Patel Kaajal14,Habsreng Eang3,Riedel Arthur4,Mwandigha Lazaro5,Koshiaris Constantinos5,Perera-Salazar Rafael5,Turner Paul12,Chanpheaktra Ngoun6,Turner Claudia126

Affiliation:

1. Cambodia Oxford Medical Research Unit, Angkor Hospital for Children, Siem Reap, Cambodia.

2. Centre for Tropical Medicine & Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

3. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Angkor Hospital for Children, Siem Reap, Cambodia.

4. Department of Global Child Health, Angkor Hospital for Children, Siem Reap, Cambodia.

5. Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

6. Angkor Hospital for Children, Siem Reap, Cambodia.

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a clinical prediction model to risk stratify children admitted to PICUs in locations with limited resources, and compare performance of the model to nine existing pediatric severity scores. Design: Retrospective, single-center, cohort study. Setting: PICU of a pediatric hospital in Siem Reap, northern Cambodia. Patients: Children between 28 days and 16 years old admitted nonelectively to the PICU. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Clinical and laboratory data recorded at the time of PICU admission were collected. The primary outcome was death during PICU admission. One thousand five hundred fifty consecutive nonelective PICU admissions were included, of which 97 died (6.3%). Most existing severity scores achieved comparable discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curves [AUCs], 0.71–0.76) but only three scores demonstrated moderate diagnostic utility for triaging admissions into high- and low-risk groups (positive likelihood ratios [PLRs], 2.65–2.97 and negative likelihood ratios [NLRs], 0.40–0.46). The newly derived model outperformed all existing severity scores (AUC, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.80–0.88; p < 0.001). Using one particular threshold, the model classified 13.0% of admissions as high risk, among which probability of mortality was almost ten-fold greater than admissions triaged as low-risk (PLR, 5.75; 95% CI, 4.57–7.23 and NLR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.37–0.59). Decision curve analyses indicated that the model would be superior to all existing severity scores and could provide utility across the range of clinically plausible decision thresholds. Conclusions: Existing pediatric severity scores have limited potential as risk stratification tools in resource-constrained PICUs. If validated, our prediction model would be a readily implementable mechanism to support triage of critically ill children at admission to PICU and could provide value across a variety of contexts where resource prioritization is important.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3