Retrospective Validation of a Computerized Physiologic Equation to Predict Minute Ventilation Needs in Critically Ill Children

Author:

Pelletier Jonathan H.1,Rakkar Jaskaran2,Au Alicia K.,Fuhrman Dana Y.34,Clark Robert S.B.,Kochanek Patrick M.,Horvat Christopher M.

Affiliation:

1. Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Akron Children’s Hospital, Akron, OH.

2. Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Phoenix Children’s Hospital, Phoenix, AZ.

3. Department Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.

4. Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.

Abstract

Objectives: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is pervasive among critically ill children. We sought to validate a computerized physiologic equation to predict minute ventilation requirements in children and test its performance against clinician actions in an in silico trial. Design: Retrospective, electronic medical record linkage, cohort study. Setting: Quaternary PICU. Patients: Patients undergoing invasive MV, serial arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis within 1–6 hours, and pharmacologic neuromuscular blockade (NMB). Measurements and Main Results: ABG values were filtered to those occurring during periods of NMB. Simultaneous ABG and minute ventilation data were linked to predict serial Paco 2 and pH values using previously published physiologic equations. There were 15,121 included ABGs across 500 encounters among 484 patients, with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 20 (10–43) ABGs per encounter at a duration of 3.6 (2.1–4.2) hours. The median (IQR) Paco 2 prediction error was 0.00 (–3.07 to 3.00) mm Hg. In Bland-Altman analysis, the mean error was –0.10 mm Hg (95% CI, –0.21 to 0.01 mm Hg). A nested, in silico trial of ABGs meeting criteria for weaning (respiratory alkalosis) or escalation (respiratory acidosis), compared the performance of recommended ventilator changes versus clinician decisions. There were 1,499 of 15,121 ABGs (9.9%) among 278 of 644 (43.2%) encounters included in the trial. Calculated predictions were favorable to clinician actions in 1124 of 1499 ABGs (75.0%), equivalent to clinician choices in 26 of 1499 ABGs (1.7%), and worse than clinician decisions in 349 of 1499 ABGs (23.3%). Calculated recommendations were favorable to clinician decisions in sensitivity analyses limiting respiratory rate, analyzing only when clinicians made changes, excluding asthma, and excluding acute respiratory distress syndrome. Conclusions: A computerized equation to predict minute ventilation requirements outperformed clinicians’ ventilator adjustments in 75% of ABGs from critically ill children in this retrospective analysis. Prospective validation studies are needed.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3