Reappraising the Role of Intraoperative Neck Margin Revision in Post-Neoadjuvant Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Author:

Malleo Giuseppe1,Lionetto Gabriella1,Crippa Stefano2,Qadan Motaz3,Moser Giada1,Belfiori Giulio2,Scarpa Aldo4,Schiavo-Lena Marco5,Casciani Fabio1,Mattiolo Paola4,Paiella Salvatore1,Esposito Alessandro1,Luchini Claudio4,Ferrone Cristina R.36,Lillemoe Keith D.3,Fernández-Del Castillo Carlos3,Falconi Massimo2,Salvia Roberto1

Affiliation:

1. Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy

2. Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy

3. Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA

4. Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy

5. Division of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy Department of Surgery

6. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether revision of pancreatic neck margin based on intraoperative frozen section analysis has oncologic value in post-neoadjuvant pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Summary Background Data: The role of intraoperative neck margin revision has been controversial, with little information specific to post-neoadjuvant PD. Methods: Patients who underwent post-neoadjuvant PD (2013-2019) for conventional PDAC with frozen section analysis of neck margin at three academic institutions were included. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared across three groups: complete resection achieved en-bloc (CR-EB), complete resection achieved non-en-bloc (CR-NEB), and incomplete resection (IR). Results: Among the 671 patients included, 524 (78.1%) underwent CR-EB, 119 (17.7%) CR-NEB and 28 (4.2%) IR. Patients undergoing CR-NEB and IR exhibited larger tumors and lower rates of RECIST response, requiring vascular resections more often. Likewise, CR-NEB and IR were associated with a worse pathological profile than CR-EB. The incidence of postoperative complications and access to adjuvant treatment were comparable among groups. A CR-EB was associated with the longest OS duration (34.3 mo). In patients with positive neck margin, obtaining a CR-NEB via re-excision was associated with a comparable OS relative to patients with an IR (26.9 vs. 27.1 mo, P=0.901). Similar results were observed for RFS. At multivariable analysis, neck margin status was not independently associated with survival and recurrence. Conclusion: Conversion of an initially positive pancreatic neck margin by additional resection is not associated with oncologic benefits in post-neoadjuvant PD and cannot be routinely recommended.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3