You Cannot Function in “Overwhelm”: Helping Primary Care Navigate the Slow End of the Pandemic

Author:

Sullivan Erin E.1,Etz Rebecca S.,Gonzalez Martha M.2,Deubel Jordyn3,Reves Sarah R.4,Stange Kurt C.5,Hughes Lauren S.6,Linzer Mark7

Affiliation:

1. Sawyer School of Business at Suffolk University, Boston, Massachusetts, and the Center for Primary Care, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

2. Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good and the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia

3. Sawyer School of Business at Suffolk University

4. Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good and the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University

5. Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good and the Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

6. Eugene S. Farley, Jr. Health Policy Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado

7. Department of Medicine and Institute for Professional Worklife, Hennepin Healthcare and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Abstract

SUMMARY Goal: This study was developed to explicate underlying organizational factors contributing to the deterioration of primary care clinicians’ mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Using data from the Larry A. Green Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good’s national survey of primary care clinicians from March 2020 to March 2022, a multidisciplinary team analyzed more than 11,150 open-ended comments. Phase 1 of the analysis happened in real-time as surveys were returned, using deductive and inductive coding. Phase 2 used grounded theory to identify emergent themes. Qualitative findings were triangulated with the survey’s quantitative data. Principal Findings: The clinicians shifted from feelings of anxiety and uncertainty at the start of the pandemic to isolation, lack of fulfillment, moral injury, and plans to leave the profession. The frequency with which they spoke of depression, burnout, and moral injury was striking. The contributors to this distress included crushing workloads, worsening staff shortages, and insufficient reimbursement. Consequences, both felt and anticipated, included fatigue and demoralization from the inability to manage escalating workloads. Survey findings identified responses that could alleviate the mental health crisis, namely: (1) measuring and customizing workloads based on work capacity; (2) quantifying resources needed to return to sufficient staffing levels; (3) promoting state and federal support for sustainable practice infrastructures with less administrative burden; and (4) creating patient visits of different lengths to rebuild relationships and trust and facilitate more accurate diagnoses. Practical Applications: Attention to clinicians’ mental health should be rapidly directed to on-demand, confidential mental health support so they can receive the care they need and not worry about any stigma or loss of license for accepting that help. Interventions that address work–life balance, workload, and resources can improve care, support retention of the critically important primary care workforce, and attract more trainees to primary care careers.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3