Affiliation:
1. School of Philosophy, Australian National University
2. Department of Philosophy, Montmorency College
Abstract
Many philosophers have adopted epistemic expressivism in recent years. The core commitment of epistemic expressivism is that epistemic claims express conative states. This paper assesses the plausibility of this commitment. First, we raise a new type of problem for epistemic expressivism, the epistemic motivation problem. The problem arises because epistemic expressivists must provide an account of the motivational force of epistemic judgment (the mental state expressed by an epistemic claim), yet various features of our mental economy seem to show that they can’t do so. Second, we develop what we take to be the most promising response to that problem for expressivists. We end by noting that this response faces an important challenge pertaining to the psychology of epistemic criticism and praise.
Publisher
University of Michigan Library
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference40 articles.
1. Moderate Epistemic Expressivism;Ahlstrom-Vij, Kristoffer;Philosophical Studies,2013
2. The Deontological Conception of Epistemic Justification;Alston, William P.;Philosophical Perspectives,1988
3. Beddor, Robert (2016). Reduction in Epistemology. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.