Affiliation:
1. Department of Philosophy and the Weinberg Institute for Cognitive Science, University of Michigan
Abstract
In updating our beliefs on the basis of our background attitudes and evidence we frequently employ objects in our environment to represent pertinent information. For example, we may write our premises and lemmas on a whiteboard to aid in a proof or move the beads of an abacus to assist in a calculation. In both cases, we generate extramental (that is, occurring outside of the mind) representational states, and, at least in the case of the abacus, we operate over these states in light of their contents (e.g., the integers represented by the beads) to generate new representations. In this paper, I argue that our belief updating processes and the grounds of their rational evaluation are partly constituted by extramental representations and operations. In other words, we don’t merely update our attitudes through an internal process of reasoning on the basis of available evidence. If we are to accurately understand and rationally evaluate our belief updating processes and resultant attitudes, we need to examine how we representationally appropriate our extramental environment in the updating process.
Publisher
University of Michigan Library
Reference117 articles.
1. Meta-Reasoning: Monitoring and Control of Thinking and Reasoning;Ackerman, RakefetValerie A. Thompson;Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2017a
2. Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology;Alderson-Day, BenCharles Fernyhough;Psychological Bulletin,2015
3. Acalculia and Dyscalculia;Ardila, AlfredoMónica Rosselli;Neuropsychology Review,2002