Fictionalism about Chatbots

Author:

Mallory Fintan1

Affiliation:

1. University of Oslo

Abstract

According to widely accepted views in metasemantics, the outputs of chatbots and other artificial text generators should be meaningless. They aren’t produced with communicative intentions and the systems producing them are not following linguistic conventions. Nevertheless, chatbots have assumed roles in customer service and healthcare, they are spreading information and disinformation and, in some cases, it may be more rational to trust the outputs of bots than those of our fellow human beings. To account for the epistemic role of chatbots in our society, we need to reconcile these observations. This paper argues that our engagement with chatbots should be understood as a form of prop-oriented make-believe; the outputs of chatbots are literally meaningless but fictionally meaningful. With the make-believe approach, we can understand how chatbots can provide us with knowledge of the world through quasi-testimony while preserving our metasemantic theories. This account also helps to connect the study of chatbots with the epistemology of scientific instruments.

Publisher

University of Michigan Library

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference41 articles.

1. Climbing towards NLU: On Meaning, Form, and Understanding in the Age of Data;Bender, Emily M.Alexander Koller;Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics,2020

2. Linguistic Fundamentals for Natural Language Processing II: 100 Essentials from Semantics and Pragmatics;Bender, Emily M.Alex Lascarides;Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies,2019

3. On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big?;Bender, Emily M.Timnit GebruAngelina McMillan-MajorShmargaret Shmitchell;Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency,2021

4. Individualism and the Mental;Burge, Tyler;Midwest Studies in Philosophy,1979

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3