Affiliation:
1. Rutgers University–Camden
Abstract
In deciding whether to forgive, we often focus on the wrongdoer, looking for an apology or a change of ways. However, to fully consider whether to forgive, we need to expand our focus from the wrongdoer and their wrongdoing, and we need to consider who we are, what we care about, and what we want to care about. The difference between blame and forgiveness is, at bottom, a difference in priorities. When we blame, we prioritize the wrong, and when we forgive, we shift our priorities away from the wrong. Recognizing this essential role for priorities in forgiveness allows us to address a thorny puzzle in thinking about forgiveness: how is it that forgiveness can be both principled and elective? If there is sufficient reason to forgive, as will sometimes be the case because forgiveness is principled, how can it be reasonable to withhold forgiveness? Recognizing that forgiveness is a shift in our priorities dissolves this apparent tension between forgiveness being principled and forgiveness being elective.
Publisher
University of Michigan Library
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference42 articles.
1. Being Sympathetic to Bad-History Wrongdoers;Agule, Craig K.;Pacific Philosophical Quarterly,2021
2. Wiping the Slate Clean: The Heart of Forgiveness;Allais, Lucy;Philosophy & Public Affairs,2008
3. Elective Forgiveness;Allais, Lucy;International Journal of Philosophical Studies,2013
4. The Priority of Gifted Forgiveness: A Response to Fricker;Allais, Lucy;Australasian Philosophical Review,2019
5. Forgiving as Emotional Distancing;Amaya, Santiago;Social Philosophy and Policy,2019
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Our Statues of Wrongdoers;Journal of Applied Philosophy;2024-06-19