Affiliation:
1. Institute of Chinese Literature and Philosophy, Academia Sinica
Abstract
Especially over the past twenty years, a number of analytic philosophers have embraced the idea that the world itself is vague or indeterminate in one or more respects. The issue then arises as to whether it can be the case that the world itself is indeterminate in all respects. Using as a basis Chinese Madhyamaka Buddhist thought, I offer two reasons for the coherence and intelligibility of the thesis that all concrete things are themselves indeterminate with respect to the ways they are. The first reason draws on a notion reminiscent of the picture of reality as an amorphous lump, while the second reason makes use of the relativity of conceptual perspectives and determinations. Assuming that the world is the mere totality of all concrete things, I show that there is a genuine metaphysical possibility of the world’s being indeterminate in all respects.
Publisher
University of Michigan Library
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference31 articles.
1. Nāgārjuna’s “Middle Way”: A Non-Eliminative Understanding of Selflessness;Arnold, Dan;Revue Internationale de Philosophie,2010
2. Arguments against Metaphysical Indeterminacy and Vagueness;Barnes, Elizabeth;Philosophy Compass,2010
3. Fundamental Indeterminacy;Barnes, Elizabeth;Analytic Philosophy,2014
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献