Pandangan dan Tantangan Guru dalam Penerapan Metode Socrates untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar

Author:

Fawaid Achmad,Nadifah Nadifah

Abstract

Critical thinking skill is a major concern in education throughout the world, with the aim of preparing students for the learning context of the 21st century. However, many teachers have difficulty adopting this new teaching method. This qualitative research aims to investigate teachers' views and the obstacles they face when implementing the Socratic method, an inquiry-based learning approach, in the classroom. Researchers used a purposive sampling method to select five Indonesian language teachers and conducted semi-structured interviews. Data analysis shows that most teachers see positively the application of the Socratic method in improving students' critical thinking skills. However, they face challenges, especially related to knowledge of teaching materials, questioning skills, student participation, topic selection, and time constraints. Based on these findings, this research recommends the need for additional support for teachers, especially in terms of understanding Indonesian language subject matter and effective teaching skills while implementing the Socratic method in the classroom.

Publisher

STAI Auliaurrasyidin Tembilahan

Reference71 articles.

1. Abrams, J. R. (2015). Reframing the Socratic method. Journal of Legal Education, 64(4), 562–585.

2. Acim, R. (2018). The Socratic method of instruction: An experience with a reading comprehension course. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 8(1), 4.

3. Akhsani, L., Kartono, K., Junaedi, I., & Asih, T. S. N. A. (2022). Pengaruh Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa pada Model PBL dengan Metode Socrates. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana (PROSNAMPAS), 5(1), 625–629.

4. Al-Darwish, S. (2012). The Role of Teacher Questions and the Socratic Method in EFL Classrooms in Kuwait. World Journal of Education, 2(4), 76–84.

5. Alias, A., Mohtar, L. E., Ayop, S. K., & Rahim, F. R. (2022). A Systematic Review on Instruments to Assess Critical Thinking & Problem-Solving Skills. EDUCATUM Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology, 9, 38–47.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3