Measuring the impact of employment on persons with a disability as a means of improving the quality of employment outcomes

Author:

Smith PeterORCID,Parmenter TrevorORCID

Abstract

Aim: Current measures for disability employment focus on system outputs, not individual outcomes. This paper proposes an employment outcome measurement approach based on social quality theory as a means of improving the quality of employment outcomes for individuals. Introduction: There is a paucity of government policies that promote practices which address the measurement of employment outcomes that reflect the goals of the individual. While there has been a recent trend towards a focus on quality of life as an outcome, process measurement and compliance to procedural regulations are still dominant. Method: A scoping review of disability employment research from the year 2000 revealed only eleven papers which specifically addressed approaches to measuring disability employment outcomes at an individual impact level. Overall, the search failed to highlight any measure that focused on the impact of employment on the individual with existing measures focused on process measurement. Conclusion: An outcomes-based approach, based on the four pillars of social quality theory, namely, social inclusion, social cohesion, self-determination, and social-economic security provide an opportunity to shift disability employment service provision towards individual outcomes rather than its existing focus on system outputs as a measure of success.

Publisher

Alma Mater Europaea - ECM

Reference64 articles.

1. Abbott, P., & Wallace, C. (2012). Social Quality: A Way to Measure the Quality of Society. Social Indices Research, 108, 153-167.

2. Attwell, K., Meyer, S.B., & Ward, P.R. (2018). The Social Basis of Vaccine Questioning and Refusal: A Qualitative Study Employ-ing Bourdieu’s Concepts of ‘Capitals’ and ‘Habitus’. International Journal of Envi-ronmental Research and Public Health, 15. https://doi: 10.3390/ijerph15051044

3. Australian Government, 1986. Disability Services Act 1986 (Cth)(Austl.).

4. Australian Government, 2013. National Disabil-ity Insurance Scheme 2013 (Cth) (Austl.).

5. Australian Social Inclusion Board (2012). Social Inclusion in Australia: How is Australia far-ing? Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3