Abstract
While the first utopias manifested aspirations for a better socio-political system, dystopias typically reflect societal fears and concerns that are intensified by the twentieth century’s political and social crises that, besides other significant turns, have caused a rethinking of the role of the elderly in the society. While, typically, the protagonists of dystopias are very young or middle-aged, they often must interact with the previous generations to achieve their goals, thus providing an exciting field for analysis of how these elderlies are depicted in dystopian novels. The methodology for comparing the treatment of the elderly in Utopia with the treatment of the elderly in Lois Lowry’s The Giver involves literary analysis and a comparison of the specific ways in which the elderly in both works are depicted. Special attention is paid to the specific ways in which they are treated and the roles they are assigned in their respective societies, as well as the level of respect and care they are shown especially at the end of their lives. The characteristic attitude towards the elderly suggested by More in Utopia is masterfully rendered in Lowry’s twentieth-century dystopia, The Giver. The study reveals that the treatment of the elderly has often been discriminatory in More’s work Utopia and is deliberately portrayed as such in Lowry’s novel.
Reference26 articles.
1. Aitmatov, C. (1983) The Day Lasts More Than a Hundred Years (trans. J. French). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
2. Beaumont, M. (2005) Utopia Ltd. Ideologies of Social Dreaming in England 1870-1900. Leiden and Boston, NY: Koninklijke Brill.
3. Booker, M. K. (1994) Dystopian Literature: A Theory and Research Guide. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
4. Boréus, K. (2006) Discursive discrimination: A typology. European Journal of Social Theory, 9 (3): 405-424. Available from https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431006065721 [Accessed on 20 August 2022].
5. Claeys, G. (2017) Dystopia: A Natural History; A study of modern despotisms, its antecedents, and its literary diffractions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.