The role of digital innovation in improving healthcare quality in extreme adversity: an interpretative phenomenological analysis study

Author:

Lounsbury Olivia1ORCID,Roberts Lily1,Kurek Natalia1,Shaw Alexandra1,Flott Kelsey1,Ghafur Saira1,Labrique Alain2,Leatherman Sheila3,Darzi Ara4,Luísa Neves Ana5

Affiliation:

1. Johns Hopkins Children's Center, Baltimore, MD, United States; Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, UK

2. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States

3. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States

4. Imperial College London, UK

5. Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, UK; Centre for Health Technology and Services Research/Department of Community Medicine, Information and Decision in Health, University of Porto, Portugal

Abstract

Background High quality is a necessary feature of healthcare delivery. Healthcare quality challenges are particularly present in conditions of extreme adversity, such as conflict settings or sustained humanitarian crises. Digital health technologies have recently emerged as an innovation to deliver care around the world in a variety of settings. However, there is little insight into how digital health technologies can be used to improve the quality of care where extreme adversity introduces unique challenges. This study aimed to identify how digital health technologies may be most impactful in improving the quality of care and evaluate opportunities for accelerated and meaningful digital innovation in adverse settings. Methods A phenomenological approach (Interpretative Phenomenological Approach [IPA]), using semi-structured interviews, was adopted. Six individuals were interviewed in person based on their expertise in global health, international care delivery, and the application of digital health technologies to improve the quality of care in extreme adversity settings. The interviews were informed by a semi-structured topic guide with open-ended questions. The transcripts were compiled verbatim and were systematically examined by two authors, using the framework analysis method to extract themes and subthemes. Results The participants identified several areas in which digital health technologies could be most impactful, which include engagement in care, continuity of care, workforce operations, and data collection. Opportunities for accelerated digital innovation include improving terminology, identity, ownership, and interoperability, identifying priority areas for digital innovation, developing tailored solutions, coordination and standardisation, and sustainability and resilience. Conclusions These results suggest that there are conditions that favour or challenge the application of digital health technologies, even in specific areas in which they could be useful. A better understanding of the drivers and barriers to digitally driven quality improvement in settings of extreme adversity could inform international policies and optimisation strategies for the future.

Publisher

Inishmore Laser Scientific Publishing Ltd

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science

Reference33 articles.

1. Quality health care in extreme adversity—an action framework;Sheila Leatherman;International Journal for Quality in Health Care,2019

2. Improving emergency obstetric care and reversing the underutilisation of vacuum extraction: A qualitative study of implementation in Tete Province, Mozambique;D. Geelhoed;BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth,2018

3. Quality of care in fragile, conflict-affected and vulnerable settings

4. Quality of health care and patient safety in extreme adversity settings in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: A qualitative multicountry assessment;Mondher Letaief;Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal,2021

5. Emergence of personalised health technology;Luke Nelson Allen;Journal of Medical Internet Research,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3