Clinical research: Should patients pay to play?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Clinical research: Should patients pay to play?

Published:2015-07-29 Issue:298 Volume:7 Page:
ISSN:1946-6234
Container-title:Science Translational Medicine
language:en
Short-container-title:Sci. Transl. Med.

Author:

Emanuel Ezekiel J.¹,Joffe Steven¹,Grady Christine²,Wendler David²,Persad Govind³

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19146-6303, USA.

2. Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

3. Department of Philosophy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2155, USA.

Abstract

Permitting patients to pay for participation in clinical research threatens the principles of social value and fair subject-selection as well as robust clinical trial design.

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference15 articles.

1. Guinea Pigs on the payroll: The ethics of paying research subjects

2. What's the Price of a Research Subject? Approaches to Payment for Research Participation

3. L. Stunkel M. Benson L. McLellan N. Sinaii G. Bedarida E. Emanuel C. Grady Comprehension and informed consent: Assessing the effect of a short consent form. IRB 32 1–9 (2010). 6.

4. Fee-for-Service Research

5. Providing Experimental Therapies as a Commercial Venture Fails

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Clinical use of autologous cell-based therapies in an evolving regulatory landscape: A survey of patient experiences and perceptions;F1000Research;2024-08-27

2. AAV gene therapy for hereditary spastic paraplegia type 50: a phase 1 trial in a single patient;Nature Medicine;2024-06-28

3. Clinical use of autologous cell-based therapies in an evolving regulatory landscape: A survey of patient experiences and perceptions;F1000Research;2023-09-18

4. Acceptability of donor funding for clinical trials in the UK: a qualitative empirical ethics study using focus groups to elicit the views of research patient public involvement group members, research ethics committee chairs and clinical researchers;BMJ Open;2022-06

5. Online seminars as an information source for direct-to-consumer stem cell therapy;Regenerative Medicine;2022-02