Disentangling the evolutionary drivers of social complexity: A comprehensive test of hypotheses

Author:

Turchin Peter123ORCID,Whitehouse Harvey3ORCID,Gavrilets Sergey4,Hoyer Daniel567ORCID,François Pieter3,Bennett James S.8ORCID,Feeney Kevin C.9,Peregrine Peter10ORCID,Feinman Gary11ORCID,Korotayev Andrey12ORCID,Kradin Nikolay13ORCID,Levine Jill14,Reddish Jenny1ORCID,Cioni Enrico5,Wacziarg Romain15ORCID,Mendel-Gleason Gavin9,Benam Majid1

Affiliation:

1. Complexity Science Hub Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

2. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.

3. Centre for the Study of Social Cohesion, School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

4. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Mathematics, Center for the Dynamics of Social Complexity, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.

5. Seshat: Global History Databank, Evolution Institute, San Antonio, FL, USA.

6. George Brown College, Toronto, Canada.

7. Evolution Institute, San Antonio, FL, USA.

8. University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

9. TerminusDB, Dublin, Ireland.

10. Lawrence University, Appleton, WI, USA.

11. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, USA.

12. National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.

13. Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnology, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia.

14. Evolution Institute, Tampa, FL, USA

15. University of California Los Angeles, Anderson School of Management, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Abstract

During the Holocene, the scale and complexity of human societies increased markedly. Generations of scholars have proposed different theories explaining this expansion, which range from broadly functionalist explanations, focusing on the provision of public goods, to conflict theories, emphasizing the role of class struggle or warfare. To quantitatively test these theories, we develop a general dynamical model based on the theoretical framework of cultural macroevolution. Using this model and Seshat: Global History Databank, we test 17 potential predictor variables proxying mechanisms suggested by major theories of sociopolitical complexity (and >100,000 combinations of these predictors). The best-supported model indicates a strong causal role played by a combination of increasing agricultural productivity and invention/adoption of military technologies (most notably, iron weapons and cavalry in the first millennium BCE).

Publisher

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Cited by 27 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3